Timeline for Lindelöf hypothesis claim
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2022 at 15:03 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | @DavidLoeffler I wanted to merely point out that Brumley asserts that the Lindelöf Hypothesis is out of reach at present, and therefore indirectly says that it has not been proved by Fokas. | |
| Jan 15, 2022 at 8:06 | comment | added | David Loeffler | PS: Chandan, have you perhaps been misled by the Quanta Magazine article on Nelson's work? It is staggeringly misleading, even by Quanta's dubious standards. | |
| Jan 15, 2022 at 8:05 | comment | added | David Loeffler | This is a survey of new work (presumably mostly about Paul Nelson's preprint from Sep 2021) which has nothing to do with Fokas. It also has nothing to do with Lindelof, in some sense, because it is about extending to more general L-functions things that have been known for $\zeta$ for decades ("resolu par Weyl et Hardy-Littlewood"). So it is clearly not relevant to this (long-dormant) thread. | |
| Jan 15, 2022 at 5:10 | history | answered | Chandan Singh Dalawat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |