Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 20, 2022 at 20:12 comment added Z. M Just to add that I was mistaken. The left adjoint from condensed sets to condensed abelian groups does exist and seems to coincide with the derived version. Indeed, it suffices to check the values at extremally disconnected sets.
Jan 20, 2022 at 14:03 vote accept Peter Kropholler
Jan 20, 2022 at 14:03 answer added Peter Kropholler timeline score: 1
Jan 17, 2022 at 12:21 comment added Peter Scholze The condensed $\mathbb F_p$-vector space $\mathbb F_p[S]$ sits in degree $0$ for any compact Hausdorff space $S$. It is naturally an increasing union of compact Hausdorff subsets $\mathbb F_p[S]_{\leq n}$ where this is the set of those sums $\sum_{s\in S} n_s [s]$ where one can choose the $n_s\in \mathbb Z$ with $\sum |n_s|\leq n$. See Proposition 2.1 and Exercise 2.3 in Analytic.pdf for the discussion for $\mathbb Z[S]$ (which carries over without much change to $\mathbb F_p[S]$). These things are not solid as soon as $S$ is infinite.
Jan 15, 2022 at 14:05 comment added Peter Kropholler OK. I may have misunderstood: when I wrote F_p[S] I had in mind the result of applying the left adjoint to the forgetful functor from condensed F_p vector spaces to condensed sets to the condensed set S: I hope I am correct that such a left adjoint exists.
Jan 15, 2022 at 13:46 comment added Z. M You would take $S$ to be a profinite set, otherwise $\mathbb F_p[S]$ lives in the derived category.
Jan 15, 2022 at 12:34 comment added Peter Kropholler @Z.M Thanks for this advice, I had overlooked the discussion in math.uni-bonn.de/people/scholze/Analytic.pdf where Theorem 2.9 gives a very clear characterisation of the solid F_p vector spaces. I guess this means that typically, F_p[S] is not solid when S is a compact Hausdorff space.
Jan 15, 2022 at 10:52 comment added Maxime Ramzi @Z.M : you should post this as an answer :)
Jan 14, 2022 at 16:22 comment added Z. M If you look for a concrete example, see the example right after Exercise 2.3, and replacing $\mathbb Z$ by $\mathbb F_p$.
Jan 14, 2022 at 16:19 comment added Z. M Does Theorem 2.9 of Lectures in Analytic Geometry answer your question?
Jan 14, 2022 at 11:19 history edited YCor
edited tags
Jan 14, 2022 at 10:42 history asked Peter Kropholler CC BY-SA 4.0