Skip to main content

Let X$X$ be a complex analytic space. It is a 'well known fact' that the categories of local systems on X$X$ (i.e. locally constant sheaves with stalk C^n$C^n$), and of (holomorphic) vector bundles on X$X$ with flat connection, are equivalent. I've been looking for a proof of this, but every reference I can find merely says something like 'this is well known' without further argument. Does anyone know of a proof?

Let X be a complex analytic space. It is a 'well known fact' that the categories of local systems on X (i.e. locally constant sheaves with stalk C^n), and of (holomorphic) vector bundles on X with flat connection, are equivalent. I've been looking for a proof of this, but every reference I can find merely says something like 'this is well known' without further argument. Does anyone know of a proof?

Let $X$ be a complex analytic space. It is a 'well known fact' that the categories of local systems on $X$ (i.e. locally constant sheaves with stalk $C^n$), and of (holomorphic) vector bundles on $X$ with flat connection, are equivalent. I've been looking for a proof of this, but every reference I can find merely says something like 'this is well known' without further argument. Does anyone know of a proof?

give a descriptive title
Link
Reid Barton
  • 25.2k
  • 1
  • 76
  • 133

Why are these categorieslocal systems on a complex analytic space equivalent to vector bundles with flat connection?

Source Link
Ketil Tveiten
  • 1.5k
  • 15
  • 21

Why are these categories equivalent?

Let X be a complex analytic space. It is a 'well known fact' that the categories of local systems on X (i.e. locally constant sheaves with stalk C^n), and of (holomorphic) vector bundles on X with flat connection, are equivalent. I've been looking for a proof of this, but every reference I can find merely says something like 'this is well known' without further argument. Does anyone know of a proof?