Skip to main content

Timeline for Why is this set stationary?

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 10, 2010 at 5:26 history edited Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
edited tags
Oct 7, 2010 at 16:05 comment added Marc Alcobé García Maybe you have institutional access to Springerlink and you don't know it. The book is available there for free.
Oct 7, 2010 at 15:04 vote accept Stefan Hoffelner
Oct 7, 2010 at 14:45 answer added Péter Komjáth timeline score: 10
Oct 7, 2010 at 11:30 comment added dvitek @Willie: given that it is not unheard of for authors to publish downloadable copies of their books online, I don't think his question was out of line...
Oct 7, 2010 at 11:17 comment added Stefan Hoffelner No I didn't complain that the book isn't online at all. I just wanted to say that the reference to the book doesn't help me as I can't find it. Of course I looked for the book in our library, before I stated my comment. If anyone feels offended I apologize, this wasn't my intention.
Oct 7, 2010 at 10:46 comment added Willie Wong (Did you just seriously complain, to the author, that no one has made illegal copies of his book available on the internet?) Have you tried looking for the book in a library?
Oct 7, 2010 at 10:07 comment added Stefan Hoffelner The book is unfortunately not online available, so could anyone give the proof?
Oct 7, 2010 at 8:19 comment added Péter Komjáth Also, you can use my book, Komjath-Totik: Problems and theorems in classical set theory, Springer, 2006. This is problem 29.19.
Oct 7, 2010 at 8:16 comment added Péter Komjáth You only have to show, that if $F:[\omega_2]^{<\omega}\longrightarrow[\omega_2]^{\aleph_0}$ then some element of $S$ is closed under $F$.
Oct 7, 2010 at 7:26 history asked Stefan Hoffelner CC BY-SA 2.5