Skip to main content
added 487 characters in body
Source Link
Alec Rhea
  • 10.1k
  • 3
  • 30
  • 88

For the purpose of this post, we will identify a monad $T$ on a category $\mathcal{C}$ with a lax $2$-functor $T:{\bf 1}\to\mathfrak{Cat}$ such that $T(*)=\mathcal{C}$.

There is an obvious forgetful functor $$?:[{\bf 1},\mathfrak{Cat}]_{lax}\to\mathfrak{Cat}$$ sending a monad to its underlying category.

Does this $2$-functor have a left or right adjoint?

I think one of the two is given by sending a category $\mathcal{C}$ to the trivial monad $(1_\mathcal{C},1_{1_\mathcal{C}},1_{1_\mathcal{C}})$ on $\mathcal{C}$, but if the other adjoint exists it might be more interesting.

More generally, in any $2$-category $\mathfrak{C}$ we have a forgetful functor $$?:[{\bf 1},\mathfrak{C}]_{lax}\to\mathfrak{C}$$ given by sending a monad on an object to its underlying object.

When does this $2$-functor have a left/right adjoint?

I think one of them is again given by sending an object $C$ to the trivial monad $(1_C,1_{1_C},1_{1_C})$, but I'm curious if the other always/never/sometimes exists (and if it's only sometimes what conditions it's equivalent to).

For the purpose of this post, we will identify a monad $T$ on a category $\mathcal{C}$ with a lax $2$-functor $T:{\bf 1}\to\mathfrak{Cat}$ such that $T(*)=\mathcal{C}$.

There is an obvious forgetful functor $$?:[{\bf 1},\mathfrak{Cat}]_{lax}\to\mathfrak{Cat}$$ sending a monad to its underlying category.

Does this $2$-functor have a left or right adjoint?

I think one of the two is given by sending a category $\mathcal{C}$ to the trivial monad $(1_\mathcal{C},1_{1_\mathcal{C}},1_{1_\mathcal{C}})$ on $\mathcal{C}$, but if the other adjoint exists it might be more interesting.

For the purpose of this post, we will identify a monad $T$ on a category $\mathcal{C}$ with a lax $2$-functor $T:{\bf 1}\to\mathfrak{Cat}$ such that $T(*)=\mathcal{C}$.

There is an obvious forgetful functor $$?:[{\bf 1},\mathfrak{Cat}]_{lax}\to\mathfrak{Cat}$$ sending a monad to its underlying category.

Does this $2$-functor have a left or right adjoint?

I think one of the two is given by sending a category $\mathcal{C}$ to the trivial monad $(1_\mathcal{C},1_{1_\mathcal{C}},1_{1_\mathcal{C}})$ on $\mathcal{C}$, but if the other adjoint exists it might be more interesting.

More generally, in any $2$-category $\mathfrak{C}$ we have a forgetful functor $$?:[{\bf 1},\mathfrak{C}]_{lax}\to\mathfrak{C}$$ given by sending a monad on an object to its underlying object.

When does this $2$-functor have a left/right adjoint?

I think one of them is again given by sending an object $C$ to the trivial monad $(1_C,1_{1_C},1_{1_C})$, but I'm curious if the other always/never/sometimes exists (and if it's only sometimes what conditions it's equivalent to).

edited tags
Link
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 4
  • 35
  • 40
Source Link
Alec Rhea
  • 10.1k
  • 3
  • 30
  • 88

Adjoints to the forgetful functor from the $2$-category of monads

For the purpose of this post, we will identify a monad $T$ on a category $\mathcal{C}$ with a lax $2$-functor $T:{\bf 1}\to\mathfrak{Cat}$ such that $T(*)=\mathcal{C}$.

There is an obvious forgetful functor $$?:[{\bf 1},\mathfrak{Cat}]_{lax}\to\mathfrak{Cat}$$ sending a monad to its underlying category.

Does this $2$-functor have a left or right adjoint?

I think one of the two is given by sending a category $\mathcal{C}$ to the trivial monad $(1_\mathcal{C},1_{1_\mathcal{C}},1_{1_\mathcal{C}})$ on $\mathcal{C}$, but if the other adjoint exists it might be more interesting.