Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 6, 2022 at 16:31 answer added Vidit Nanda timeline score: 12
Jan 16, 2022 at 3:24 comment added Geordie Williamson @Z.M Yes, my understanding is that ULA is precisely this: vanishing of vanishing cycles in any direction. However this seems somewhat tautological to me. I'd be interested if there is a more cumulative algebra criterion, but perhaps this is unrealistic.
Jan 13, 2022 at 11:28 comment added Con I think Theorem 6.6 of arxiv.org/pdf/1109.5886.pdf might be of interest to you. The author also shows that these "$t$-stratifications" induce Whitney stratifications.
Jan 13, 2022 at 7:21 comment added Z. M @GeordieWilliamson I am a layman, but do universal local acyclicity maps work like that?
Jan 13, 2022 at 3:34 answer added Balarka Sen timeline score: 2
Jan 13, 2022 at 1:49 comment added UVIR @TomGoodwillie Given an algebraic variety, we can consider the set of its smooth points. Then for the set of singular points (which has strictly lower dimension) we can consider its set of smooth points again. This construction gives a stratification which is algebraic but not necessarily Whitney.
Jan 13, 2022 at 1:42 comment added Geordie Williamson A closely related question that I've often wondered about: is it possible to define "topologically locally trivial fibration" in commutative algebra? Of course "smooth morphism" covers smooth fibres, but when the fibres are singular I'm not sure...
Jan 13, 2022 at 1:39 comment added Geordie Williamson @TomGoodwillie a classic example is given by Whitney's umbrella: the stratification by "regular locus" union "singular locus" is not Whitney.
Jan 12, 2022 at 21:50 comment added Tom Goodwillie Do you have in mind an example of a non-Whitney but algebraic stratification of something?
Jan 12, 2022 at 19:53 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Typo in title
Jan 12, 2022 at 19:43 history asked UVIR CC BY-SA 4.0