Timeline for who fixed the topology on ideles?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2010 at 13:50 | history | edited | Tony Scholl | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body
|
| Oct 7, 2010 at 13:22 | comment | added | Tony Scholl | I have read some more and edited my reply accordingly | |
| Oct 7, 2010 at 13:22 | history | edited | Tony Scholl | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 987 characters in body
|
| Oct 7, 2010 at 13:14 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | Wo ist Franz ?? | |
| Oct 7, 2010 at 10:17 | comment | added | KConrad | When I asked what the papers actually achieved, I meant besides the idea of embedding the ring of integers into its product of non-archimedean completions. I mean, the point of the papers couldn't have been "Look, we have this embedding", right? | |
| Oct 7, 2010 at 9:42 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | I briefly looked at Prüfer's paper yesterday and thought that he was embedding the ring of integers of a number field into its profinite completion, such as $\bf Z$ into $\hat{\bf Z}$. | |
| Oct 7, 2010 at 8:47 | comment | added | KConrad | It's a pity Jahrbuch has no entry for von Neumann's paper. Can anyone who reads German comfortably indicate what either of these papers actually achieved with the construction? | |
| Oct 7, 2010 at 7:59 | history | edited | KConrad | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 109 characters in body
|
| Oct 7, 2010 at 4:53 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | Before the Math Reviews, there was the Jahrbuch. For Hasse's review of Prüfer's paper, see emis.de/cgi-bin/jfmen/MATH/JFM/… | |
| Oct 6, 2010 at 21:33 | history | answered | Tony Scholl | CC BY-SA 2.5 |