Timeline for What is the correct statement of Theorem 4.2 in Street's "Parity Complexes"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2022 at 14:58 | history | edited | Simon Forest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 3, 2022 at 14:55 | comment | added | Simon Forest | I approve that but I would say that Street's paper was "not fully correct" instead of "wrong" :) As you said above, his paper still contains fundamental tools and ideas, which were necessary for me to find a fix, so that "wrong" feels to much discarding… | |
| Jan 3, 2022 at 14:38 | history | edited | Simon Forest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 68 characters in body
|
| Jan 3, 2022 at 14:37 | vote | accept | Tim Campion | ||
| Jan 3, 2022 at 14:31 | comment | added | Tim Campion | Thanks so much! So if I understand correctly, my reading of Street's paper was correct, but the paper was wrong. My reading of Street's corrigenda was correct, but the corrigenda were still wrong. You showed this in the counterexample on p. 13 of your paper. | |
| Jan 3, 2022 at 14:06 | history | answered | Simon Forest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |