Timeline for Is this a contraction mapping for small $T$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2021 at 9:01 | vote | accept | GJC20 | ||
| Dec 27, 2021 at 21:40 | answer | added | Iosif Pinelis | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 27, 2021 at 20:40 | history | edited | GJC20 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 27, 2021 at 17:13 | comment | added | GJC20 | Absolutely right! It is $h$ instead of $m$. Now corrected. Many thanks | |
| Dec 27, 2021 at 17:12 | history | edited | GJC20 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 27, 2021 at 16:53 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | Do you want to re-check your post, in particular the expression for $F$? The second double integral in that expression does not seem to depend on $h$. Also, what is $m(r)$? Is it $\ge0$? Is it bounded, in any sense? | |
| Dec 27, 2021 at 16:23 | history | asked | GJC20 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |