Skip to main content

Timeline for K-flows reference

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 5, 2022 at 13:42 vote accept jason
Feb 3, 2022 at 16:57 comment added LSpice @user103342's reference, clickably: Totoki - On a class of special flows.
Feb 3, 2022 at 16:43 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Inlining link, including name of author, and using preferred link syntax
Feb 3, 2022 at 16:38 answer added Alp Uzman timeline score: 2
Dec 27, 2021 at 18:55 comment added jason @user103342 great, this is very helpful. But it is strange, Totoki's paper cited Gurevič's paper, but in Mathscient, Totoki's paper is not in the list of citations of Gurevič's paper.
Dec 27, 2021 at 8:27 comment added user103342 Its not true that all suspensions of K-induced map are K-flows, its true if the roof function is not "essentially-constant". You can show this by (extending/understandng) the proof in: Totoki, Haruo. On a class of special flows. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebiete 15 (1970), 157–167.
Dec 26, 2021 at 21:44 comment added Asaf I guess the quickest way would be to either show that the conditions holds for powers (shouldn't be hard, given a generating partition) and then play a bit with the definition of the suspension, or otherwise go through the equivalence to uniform mixing, then the theorem is clear for powers, probably suspension is not hard as well...
Dec 26, 2021 at 14:48 history edited YCor
edited tags
Dec 26, 2021 at 14:31 comment added jason yes, but want to understand its proof. Do you know which textbooks/notes talk about it? Thanks!
Dec 26, 2021 at 7:45 comment added Asaf I don't read/understand Russian, but just skimming through the paper it seems very clear (i.e. p. 93) they use a suspension construction. Are you asking whether if one $T$ is a K-map, then all other powers (and the suspension map) are K-maps? this is indeed correct...
Dec 26, 2021 at 2:59 history asked jason CC BY-SA 4.0