Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 27, 2023 at 20:26 review Close votes
Dec 29, 2023 at 0:02
Dec 25, 2023 at 22:34 answer added Stefan Kohl timeline score: 1
Jan 16, 2022 at 18:10 comment added Quarto Bendir It's definitely possible to learn something from the answers to this kind of question, but it's worth bearing in mind that answers are pretty much limited to various papers in one or two prestige journals, and/or those papers which Quanta writers chose to pay attention to. So it's hard to get a balanced perspective.
Jan 9, 2022 at 19:50 answer added Abdelmalek Abdesselam timeline score: 11
Jan 9, 2022 at 1:48 answer added Timothy Chow timeline score: 22
Dec 29, 2021 at 3:56 comment added user551504 From the answers, it seems that a good way to notice important results outside of our specialty is to read Quanta magazine
Dec 28, 2021 at 18:29 answer added Bogdan Grechuk timeline score: 25
Dec 27, 2021 at 16:52 answer added Dan Ramras timeline score: 20
Dec 27, 2021 at 11:48 comment added Nicky Hekster For a good story on The Year in Math and Computer Science, see also here
Dec 26, 2021 at 21:00 comment added Timothy Chow A similar question was asked about ten years ago: Noteworthy achievements in and around 2010?
Dec 25, 2021 at 6:53 comment added C.F.G What do you mean by important breakthroughs? For understanding my question see these levels in math research: ordinary paper < good quality paper < systematic papers answering some important conjectures < works that lead to a new sub-branch of math (like Ricci flow inside of differential geometry/topology) < works that discover/introduce a new branch of math (such k-theory and category theory) and so on. There is also a breakthrough prize in math. Which one is related to your post?
Dec 25, 2021 at 1:03 comment added Asaf Karagila @Kimball: We're working on it!!!
Dec 25, 2021 at 0:53 answer added Ricky timeline score: 40
Dec 24, 2021 at 23:03 comment added Kimball Also, 2021 is not over. I still have a week to do something big!
Dec 24, 2021 at 20:26 history became hot network question
Dec 24, 2021 at 19:02 history edited Gerry Myerson CC BY-SA 4.0
typo
Dec 24, 2021 at 17:40 answer added James Tuite timeline score: 32
Dec 24, 2021 at 15:29 comment added Asaf Karagila Mathematics tend to be slow. It's rare to see a breakthrough "in that year" go from preprint announcement, to review, to accepted, to actually published. It's not impossible, but those tend to be shorter, smaller, e.g. some counterexample of some finite conjecture. Otherwise, things tend to take time. That's a good thing.
Dec 24, 2021 at 15:07 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Asaf Karagila
Dec 24, 2021 at 13:16 answer added Carlo Beenakker timeline score: 52
Dec 24, 2021 at 13:15 answer added Windom Earle timeline score: 28
Dec 24, 2021 at 12:21 history asked Johnny Cage CC BY-SA 4.0