Timeline for $p-1$ elements in $\mathbb{Z}_p\times\mathbb{Z}_p$ with a sum $(0,0)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2021 at 6:35 | vote | accept | Andyqian7 | ||
| Dec 18, 2021 at 5:50 | answer | added | LeechLattice | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 18, 2021 at 5:00 | history | edited | Andyqian7 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 368 characters in body
|
| Dec 18, 2021 at 4:46 | comment | added | Andyqian7 | $S$ and $T$ are said to be sets, not allowing repeated elements. | |
| Dec 18, 2021 at 4:37 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 18, 2021 at 4:06 | comment | added | LeechLattice | This is false if we allow $S$ to be a sequence and $T$ a subsequence, or in other words, we allow repeated elements in $S$. Take $S$ to be $(p-1)$ copies of $(1,1)$, $(p-1)$ copies of $(1,0)$ and $(p-1)$ copies of $(0,1)$. | |
| Dec 18, 2021 at 3:53 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
| Dec 18, 2021 at 3:35 | history | edited | Andyqian7 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
[Edit removed during grace period]
|
| Dec 18, 2021 at 3:34 | comment | added | GH from MO | @GerryMyerson It is a natural question in the light of the Erdős-Ginzburg-Ziv theorem and its many generalizations. | |
| Dec 18, 2021 at 3:27 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | What's the source of this problem, please? | |
| S Dec 18, 2021 at 3:15 | review | First questions | |||
| Dec 18, 2021 at 5:12 | |||||
| S Dec 18, 2021 at 3:15 | history | asked | Andyqian7 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |