Timeline for On the not so clear relationship between torsion theories and localization for a newcomer
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2021 at 21:03 | comment | added | fosco | Yes. A thorough introduction to localisation of categories and in particular to the special case of reflective localisations, is in the first tome of Borceux's handbook. It would take too much time to expand :-) | |
| Dec 15, 2021 at 19:36 | comment | added | Køb | @fosco Its my belief they are understanding a localization as some sort of reflection or adjunction, right? | |
| Dec 15, 2021 at 19:23 | comment | added | Køb | @fosco Thanks so so much for your article recommendation. I'm checking it out and I want to follow the last part when he establish a bijection on an abelian category between their hereditary torsion theories and localizations. I follow her definition of an (hereditary) torsion theory but Its not so clear(at least for me) what he understands as a localization. How his definition of a localization is the same like this one? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Localization_of_a_category | |
| Dec 15, 2021 at 6:56 | comment | added | fosco | The go-to reference for this kind of stuff, in general categories (but largely specialised to the additive/abelian setting) is Cassidy, Hébert and Kelly's paper. I had a good understanding of this stuff at the times. Feel free to ask more specific questions! | |
| Dec 14, 2021 at 20:27 | history | edited | Køb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 92 characters in body
|
| Dec 14, 2021 at 19:28 | history | asked | Køb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |