Skip to main content
4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 14, 2021 at 15:52 comment added M. Winter I definitely see the intuition behind your argument, but I also believe that it leaves room for a lot of subtleties. For example, I would need to show, that starting at $P$, I can reach any closed chain by a continuous transition that is non-increasing on all edge-lengths. This is not true if the target chain has winding number $\le 0$. You can argue this away of course (but you somewhere need to use that the circumcenter is inside the convex hull).
Dec 14, 2021 at 14:27 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @M.Winter: Let the radius for the original $P$ be $r$. If you shorten any link, the polygonal chain will not close at $r$, but instead will have to shrink to a smaller radius to reach closure.
Dec 14, 2021 at 13:51 comment added M. Winter Thanks for your answer. Can you explain a bit more how this relates to the proof for the case $n=m=2$?
Dec 14, 2021 at 1:30 history answered Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 4.0