Skip to main content
Fixed grammar
Source Link
user44143
user44143

In these slides of a talk Giovanni Curi shows that the generalized uniformity principle follows from TroesltrasTroesltra’s uniformity principle and from the subcountability of all sets, which are both claimed to be consistent with CZF. SubcountabilitiesSubcountability’s consistency with CZF is not surprising at all in light of counterintuitive results like that subsets of finite sets aren’t necessarily finite, etc. Butbut it does seemseems to have a different flavor.

Can you provide anyWhat are the intuitions/motivations or motivations for subcountability?

Can you provide any goodWhat references prove that proves subcountability is consistent with CZF?

In these slides of a talk Giovanni Curi shows that the generalized uniformity principle follows from Troesltras uniformity principle and subcountability, which are both claimed to be consistent with CZF. Subcountabilities consistency with CZF is not surprising at all in light of counterintuitive results like subsets of finite sets aren’t necessarily finite, etc. But it does seem to have a different flavor.

Can you provide any intuitions/motivations for subcountability?

Can you provide any good references that proves subcountability is consistent with CZF?

In these slides of a talk Giovanni Curi shows that the generalized uniformity principle follows from Troesltra’s uniformity principle and from the subcountability of all sets, which are both claimed to be consistent with CZF. Subcountability’s consistency with CZF is not surprising in light of counterintuitive results like that subsets of finite sets aren’t necessarily finite, but it seems to have a different flavor.

What are the intuitions or motivations for subcountability?

What references prove that subcountability is consistent with CZF?

Emebdded link
Source Link
Daniele Tampieri
  • 6.4k
  • 7
  • 30
  • 45

In http://www.giovannicuri.com/Talks/Slides_Kanazawa2010.pdfthese slides of a talk Giovanni Curi shows that the generalized uniformity principle follows from Troesltras uniformity principle and subcountability, which are both claimed to be consistent with CZF. Subcountabilities consistency with CZF is not surprising at all in light of counterintuitive results like subsets of finite sets aren’t necessarily finite, etc. But it does seem to have a different flavor.

Can you provide any intuitions/motivations for subcountability?

Can you provide any good references that proves subcountability is consistent with CZF?

In http://www.giovannicuri.com/Talks/Slides_Kanazawa2010.pdf the generalized uniformity principle follows from Troesltras uniformity principle and subcountability which are both claimed to be consistent with CZF. Subcountabilities consistency with CZF is not surprising at all in light of counterintuitive results like subsets of finite sets aren’t necessarily finite, etc. But it does seem to have a different flavor.

Can you provide any intuitions/motivations for subcountability?

Can you provide any good references that proves subcountability is consistent with CZF?

In these slides of a talk Giovanni Curi shows that the generalized uniformity principle follows from Troesltras uniformity principle and subcountability, which are both claimed to be consistent with CZF. Subcountabilities consistency with CZF is not surprising at all in light of counterintuitive results like subsets of finite sets aren’t necessarily finite, etc. But it does seem to have a different flavor.

Can you provide any intuitions/motivations for subcountability?

Can you provide any good references that proves subcountability is consistent with CZF?

Source Link
ToucanIan
  • 411
  • 2
  • 10

Subcountability

In http://www.giovannicuri.com/Talks/Slides_Kanazawa2010.pdf the generalized uniformity principle follows from Troesltras uniformity principle and subcountability which are both claimed to be consistent with CZF. Subcountabilities consistency with CZF is not surprising at all in light of counterintuitive results like subsets of finite sets aren’t necessarily finite, etc. But it does seem to have a different flavor.

Can you provide any intuitions/motivations for subcountability?

Can you provide any good references that proves subcountability is consistent with CZF?