Timeline for Is the absolute Galois group $\text{Gal}(\bar K/K)$ isomorphic to $\text{Gal}(K(S)/K)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 15, 2021 at 3:05 | comment | added | MAS | I don't find reason why to close this question. When I said there exists $\sigma \in \text{Gal}(K(S_n)/K)$ such that $\sigma(\alpha)=g(\alpha)$ for all $\alpha \in S_n$ is quite possible. I find no reason to disagree. In fact this is an established fact in a published paper in a reputed journal. | |
Dec 14, 2021 at 12:02 | review | Close votes | |||
Dec 20, 2021 at 3:02 | |||||
Dec 14, 2021 at 4:39 | comment | added | MAS |
@WillSawin, no, perhaps I made mistake in the language. I mean there exists at least one $\sigma \in \text{Gal}(K(S_n)/K)$ such that $\sigma(\alpha)=g(\alpha)$ for all $\alpha \in S_n$. I didn't mean all $\sigma$ will do it. Now I want to show whether that particular $\sigma$ correspond to some $\tau \in \text{Gal}(\bar K/K)$ satisfying relation like $(3)$. All I confirm is that the relation $(3)$ is valid.
|
|
Dec 14, 2021 at 4:33 | history | edited | MAS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 24 characters in body
|
Dec 14, 2021 at 3:57 | comment | added | Will Sawin | Equation (3) is also certainly false, as to be true for all $\sigma$s would imply that $\sigma(\alpha)$ is independent of $\sigma$, which, since this is also true for all $\alpha \in S_n$, only holds if the Galois group is trivial. | |
Dec 14, 2021 at 3:35 | history | edited | MAS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 212 characters in body
|
Dec 14, 2021 at 3:28 | comment | added | MAS | @WillSawin, well. Suppose $g(x) \in x\mathcal{O}[[x]]$ be another power series so that $\sigma(\alpha)=g(\alpha)$ for all $ \alpha \in S_n$ and $\sigma \in \text{Gal}(K(S_n)/K)$. I want to show this relation can be extended to $\sigma(\alpha)=g(\alpha)$ for all $\alpha \in S$ and $ \sigma \in \text{Gal}(\bar K/K)$. This is what I want. When does it follow ? | |
Dec 14, 2021 at 3:09 | comment | added | Will Sawin | Can you simply edit this question to ask only what you intend to ask, rather than leaving the old material up, which makes it a bit confusing? If you ask for all roots of all iterates of all power series, that would be enough, since every finite extension is generated by the roots of some polynomial, thus of some power series. | |
Dec 14, 2021 at 2:35 | history | edited | MAS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 466 characters in body
|
Dec 14, 2021 at 2:19 | comment | added | MAS |
I admit I should not have written the left side of $(2)$. In other words, following the above nice comments, $\text{Gal}(\bar K/K) \neq \text{Aut}(K(S)/K)$. So now the question is- when would we get such equality ? Does adjoining all roots of all iterates of all power series $f(x) \in x \mathcal{O}[[x]]$ with $K$ produce $\bar K$ or the $\text{Gal}(\bar K/K)$ ?
|
|
Dec 13, 2021 at 20:50 | comment | added | KConrad | Why do you write ${\rm Gal}(\overline{K}/K)$ on the left side of (2)? It would amount to saying $\overline{K} = K(S)$. | |
Dec 13, 2021 at 19:10 | comment | added | LSpice | Am I missing something obvious? Isn't the answer that the fibres of $\operatorname{Gal}(\bar K/K) \to \operatorname{Gal}(K(S)/K)$ are $\operatorname{Gal}(\bar K/K(S))$-torsors, so (regardless of what $K$ and $S$ are) cannot be trivial unless $K(S) = \bar K$? Or do you mean whether there is some isomorphism other than the one given by restriction? | |
Dec 13, 2021 at 19:08 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor TeXing and proofreading
|
Dec 13, 2021 at 18:51 | comment | added | Will Sawin | Under this assumption it seems that the answer is no since the Galois group of $\overline{K}$ is nonabelian but the Galois group of $K(S)$ is (by assumption) abelian. | |
Dec 13, 2021 at 17:02 | history | edited | MAS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 140 characters in body
|
Dec 13, 2021 at 16:53 | history | asked | MAS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |