Timeline for Riemannian vector bundle
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2021 at 16:51 | vote | accept | chan | ||
| Dec 11, 2021 at 20:24 | comment | added | Quarto Bendir | Ok. I think the two explanations have identical length. Anyway it's good to have facility and to know how the argument looks both ways | |
| Dec 11, 2021 at 19:46 | comment | added | Igor Belegradek | Coordinates are fine if they give a shorter explanation, which is not the case here. | |
| Dec 11, 2021 at 19:23 | comment | added | Quarto Bendir | In my view it's exactly the same as what I said in the comments, just put in a different language. I think it's very clean, but I know opinions vary on use of coordinates. | |
| Dec 11, 2021 at 18:47 | comment | added | Igor Belegradek | Not sure why you need this messy coordinate computation when (as you say in the comments) all you use is that $R(X,X)=0$ and that the curvature is a tensor. | |
| Dec 11, 2021 at 4:26 | history | answered | Quarto Bendir | CC BY-SA 4.0 |