Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

Notice removed Improve details by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Improve details by user158636
Bounty Started worth 250 reputation by CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Such an example of course could not be projective and would not itself lift to Z_p. The context is that one can compute p-adic cohomology of a variety X over a finite field F_p via the cohomology of an embedding of X into a smooth Z_p scheme.

This is similar in spirit to my questions herehere and herehere (but a different question than the second link).

Such an example of course could not be projective and would not itself lift to Z_p. The context is that one can compute p-adic cohomology of a variety X over a finite field F_p via the cohomology of an embedding of X into a smooth Z_p scheme.

This is similar in spirit to my questions here and here (but a different question than the second link).

Such an example of course could not be projective and would not itself lift to Z_p. The context is that one can compute p-adic cohomology of a variety X over a finite field F_p via the cohomology of an embedding of X into a smooth Z_p scheme.

This is similar in spirit to my questions here and here (but a different question than the second link).

fixed link
Source Link
Peter McNamara
Peter McNamara
  • 8.9k
  • 1
  • 41
  • 68

Such an example of course could not be projective and would not itself lift to Z_p. The context is that one can compute p-adic cohomology of a variety X over a finite field F_p via the cohomology of an embedding of X into a smooth Z_p scheme.

This is similar in spirit to my questions herehere and here (but a different question than the second link).

Such an example of course could not be projective and would not itself lift to Z_p. The context is that one can compute p-adic cohomology of a variety X over a finite field F_p via the cohomology of an embedding of X into a smooth Z_p scheme.

This is similar in spirit to my questions here and here (but a different question than the second link).

Such an example of course could not be projective and would not itself lift to Z_p. The context is that one can compute p-adic cohomology of a variety X over a finite field F_p via the cohomology of an embedding of X into a smooth Z_p scheme.

This is similar in spirit to my questions here and here (but a different question than the second link).

Bounty Ended with David E Speyer's answer chosen by David Zureick-Brown
added 191 characters in body
Source Link
David Zureick-Brown
David Zureick-Brown
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 39
  • 96

Such an example of course could not be projective and would not itself lift to Z_p. The context is that one can compute p-adic cohomology of a variety X over a finite field F_p via the cohomology of an embedding of X into a smooth Z_p scheme.

This is similar in spirit to my questionquestions here and here (but a different question than the second link).

Such an example of course could not be projective and would not itself lift to Z_p. The context is that one can compute p-adic cohomology of a variety X over a finite field F_p via the cohomology of an embedding of X into a smooth Z_p scheme.

This is similar in spirit to my question here.

Such an example of course could not be projective and would not itself lift to Z_p. The context is that one can compute p-adic cohomology of a variety X over a finite field F_p via the cohomology of an embedding of X into a smooth Z_p scheme.

This is similar in spirit to my questions here and here (but a different question than the second link).

Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by David Zureick-Brown
Source Link
David Zureick-Brown
David Zureick-Brown
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 39
  • 96