Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 4, 2021 at 17:03 vote accept user997814
Dec 4, 2021 at 1:09 answer added CoconesFromTwistedArrows timeline score: 2
Dec 4, 2021 at 0:28 answer added Emily timeline score: 7
Dec 3, 2021 at 19:40 comment added Fernando Muro A homotopy is just a map from a cylinder. A homotopy between homotopies is just a homotopy between such maps, relative to the boundary of the cylinder. And so on. This is not very simplicial so you can't make a quasi category out of it.
Dec 3, 2021 at 13:32 comment added user997814 Thanks, Zhen Lin!
Dec 3, 2021 at 13:16 answer added Tim Porter timeline score: 5
Dec 3, 2021 at 13:14 comment added Zhen Lin I'm not sure what you are expecting there. In some sense the answer is yes – the homotopy-coherent nerve functor sends Dwyer–Kan equivalences of Kan-enriched categories to equivalences of quasicategories, so it suffices to verify the claim at the level of Kan-enriched categories, and I'm sure this can be extracted from the proof of the Quillen equivalence between topological spaces (CW complexes) and simplicial sets (Kan complexes).
Dec 3, 2021 at 13:06 comment added user997814 Thanks! Can you prove the homotopy hypothesis with that definition?
Dec 3, 2021 at 12:41 comment added Zhen Lin It should be possible to do something like this: define a Kan-enriched category $\underline{\textbf{Top}}$ where the simplicial set $\underline{\textbf{Top}} (X, Y)$ has as its $n$-simplices the continuous maps $\Delta^n \times X \to Y$. Then you can take the homotopy-coherent nerve to get a quasicategory. This has the property that the homotopy category is the naïve homotopy category.
S Dec 3, 2021 at 12:02 review First questions
Dec 3, 2021 at 12:07
S Dec 3, 2021 at 12:02 history asked user997814 CC BY-SA 4.0