Timeline for What if Current Foundations of Mathematics are Inconsistent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2010 at 3:01 | comment | added | Pietro | Oh, OK, that's another matter entirely then. :) | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 11:05 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | (I took Doyle's depiction of Conway's objection to the form of the paper -- all the "fluff" -- as referring more to the very discursive expository style.) | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 10:48 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | I would fully agree, except that I've heard Conway say similar things in person. | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 7:04 | comment | added | Pietro | I think it's slightly misleading to represent anything in this paper as Conway's opinion. A footnote on the first page clearly says that he didn't write the paper, nor particularly liked "the exposition", which presumably includes the final remarks on inconsistency. | |
| Oct 3, 2010 at 19:43 | history | answered | Todd Trimble | CC BY-SA 2.5 |