Skip to main content

Timeline for Is SO(4) a subgroup of SU(3)?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 16, 2021 at 21:19 comment added LSpice It's the irreducibility that I was missing. Thanks!
Nov 16, 2021 at 20:32 comment added Robert Bryant @LSpice: Because the Lie algebra so(4) in su(3) has to be a module over the Lie algebra of the maximal torus t (of any subalgebra, actually), and su(3)/t is the direct sum of three inequivalent irreducible modules of dimension 2 (the three weight spaces), so so(4)/t must be a sum of some number of these weight spaces. By dimension count, it would have to be two of these weight spaces, but the Lie bracket of any two contains the third.
Nov 16, 2021 at 20:19 comment added LSpice Why would the Lie algebra have to contain the entire weight space if it intersected it non-trivially?
Nov 16, 2021 at 18:25 history answered Robert Bryant CC BY-SA 4.0