Skip to main content

Timeline for Is SO(4) a subgroup of SU(3)?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 18, 2021 at 19:15 comment added user44143 @mme, it’d be worth incorporating your new arguments into your answers (and explaining what $\mathfrak{g}$ is).
Nov 18, 2021 at 17:33 comment added mme No, the same proof works: a simply connected compact surface without boundary has pi_2 = Z. The argument in my comment works in even more generality.
Nov 18, 2021 at 17:14 comment added Michael I wonder now whether $SO_4$ has a double cover that embeds into $SU_3$.
Nov 18, 2021 at 15:45 history edited mme CC BY-SA 4.0
added 23 characters in body
Nov 18, 2021 at 15:44 comment added mme Of course; I made this explicit.
Nov 17, 2021 at 3:31 comment added Kapil You should say that $H$ is a closed subgroup of $G$ otherwise one may have taken a winding line in a torus and the quotient is not a manifold. In your case, this is automatic since $H$ is compact.
Nov 16, 2021 at 23:17 history edited mme CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Nov 16, 2021 at 23:16 comment added mme Here is an additional, more straightforward, argument. If $H \subset G$ is codimension 2, then $G/H$ is a surface. An element of $g$ acts trivially on $G/H$ if $gg'H = g'H$ for all $g'$, which amounts to saying that every conjugate of $g$ lies in $H$, which amounts to saying that $g$ lies in the intersection of all conjugates of $H$, which is a normal subgroup of $G$ (call it $K$). Now $G/K$ is a subgroup of the isometry group of a surface, hence at most 3 dimensional. When $\mathfrak g$ is simple $K$ must be 0-dimensional and $\dim G \le 3$. Conclude, because $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ is simple.
Nov 16, 2021 at 14:01 history answered mme CC BY-SA 4.0