Timeline for Research topics about non Euclidian geometry? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2021 at 20:16 | comment | added | Dave L Renfro | although the vast majority of the items in that bibliography will not be appropriate, but a handful of the later publications might be appropriate (being elementary expositions). Pretty much anything listed there is probably freely available online at google-books (just google the title, sometimes without using quotes due to .pdf character misreads; sometimes restricting the search to plus/minus two or three years of the publication date works better). Also, these Mathematics Teachers articles. | |
| Nov 14, 2021 at 20:06 | comment | added | Dave L Renfro | I am a first year undergrad --- Your use of "research topic" is probably different than what is commonly understood here, as I suspect what you are to do is to learn about some topic and write an extended essay on it. Maybe something suitable can be found in Non-Euclidean Geometry by Manning (1901; reprinted with title change by Dover Publications in 1963). Also you might want to look through Bibliography of Non-Euclidean Geometry by Sommerville (1911), (continued) | |
| Nov 14, 2021 at 19:27 | history | edited | Wigner's Friend | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 229 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2021 at 14:30 | history | closed |
Alexandre Eremenko Moishe Kohan Yemon Choi Jeremy Rickard Carl-Fredrik Nyberg Brodda |
Needs more focus | |
| Nov 14, 2021 at 4:34 | comment | added | Anton Petrunin | @BenoîtKloeckner in the standard terminology is non-euclidean geometry is a geometry that like euclidean, but not euclidean. | |
| Nov 13, 2021 at 22:49 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | @AntonPetrunin then terminology differs between people: I do consider Riemannian geometry as non-Euclidean. Do you restrict the word to constant curvature? To homogeneous spaces? In any case, the question cannot really be answered as is. | |
| Nov 13, 2021 at 18:19 | comment | added | Anton Petrunin | You made wrong tags to the question, so it is misunderstood by many. | |
| Nov 13, 2021 at 18:12 | comment | added | Anton Petrunin | @BenoîtKloeckner If geometry is not euclidean, it does not mean that it is non-euclidean. For example, Riemannian geometry is not considered to be non-euclidian. | |
| Nov 13, 2021 at 13:57 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 14, 2021 at 14:30 | |||||
| Nov 13, 2021 at 8:42 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | This question seems incredibly broad. Basically all Riemannian geometry is about non-Euclidean geometry, it is a whole field with hundreds of active researchers and hundreds of questions. Maybe you could say a little more about what you seek, for what purpose, to make the question answerable, but in any case it might still be deemed unsuitable for MO. | |
| S Nov 13, 2021 at 7:08 | review | First questions | |||
| Nov 13, 2021 at 8:09 | |||||
| S Nov 13, 2021 at 7:08 | history | asked | Wigner's Friend | CC BY-SA 4.0 |