Timeline for Bound on the size of group related to a matrix basis
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2023 at 15:59 | comment | added | Ian Gershon Teixeira | @LSpice Back in November 2021 I was think a lot about what makes the Pauli matrices special, including the generalized ones used in quantum computing for prime power qudits. I decided that one property which especially stuck out to me was that they form a basis and simultaneously they (projectively) form a finite group. I decided to ask MO if they were the minimal such object/saturated a bound for such behavior. To my amazement by the next day I had a wonderful answer from Frieder Ladisch! I was looking over it this morning bc I'm about to post to MSE something related and I made a small edit. | |
| Feb 13, 2023 at 15:52 | comment | added | LSpice | The interesting question is over a year old, but back on the front page for some reason (and not because it's unanswered, since @FriederLadisch gave a very illuminating answer below), so I'll ask while it's here: where did this condition come from? | |
| Feb 13, 2023 at 15:49 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
`\operatorname`, while this is on the front page
|
| Feb 13, 2023 at 15:33 | history | edited | Ian Gershon Teixeira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2021 at 19:28 | vote | accept | Ian Gershon Teixeira | ||
| Nov 13, 2021 at 18:12 | answer | added | Frieder Ladisch | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 12, 2021 at 16:24 | history | asked | Ian Gershon Teixeira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |