Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 10, 2021 at 13:53 history edited Shaun Han CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Nov 10, 2021 at 1:01 comment added Shaun Han @LSpice Yes I agree the notation is confusing, but you understand it correctly. I have changed the notation from $f(x,z)$ to a function space $\mathcal{C}(x, z)$. As for $f(x_0,z) \le f(x,z)$, I mean for a given fixed interval $[c,d]$ of $z$, the curve of $f(x_0,z)$ is the lowest, i.e., $x_0$ minimizes $\int_c^d f(x, z) dz$
Nov 10, 2021 at 0:50 history edited Shaun Han CC BY-SA 4.0
added 17 characters in body
Nov 10, 2021 at 0:30 comment added LSpice I don't understand the notation $f : A \to f(x, z)$. Does it mean $f : A \times [a, b] \to \mathbb R$, where we are using $x$ as the name for an element of $A$ and $z$ as the name for an element of $[a, b]$? Also, since you allow $c = d$, it seems that your condition could be expressed more concisely as: for each $x_0 \in B$, there exists at least one $z = c = d \in [a, b]$ such that $f(x_0, z) \le f(x, z)$ for all $x \in A$, or $f(x_0, z) \ge f(x, z)$ for all $x \in A$. (And presumably you mean to pick a fixed sense of inequality, right, not allow it to differ depending on $x_0$?)
Nov 10, 2021 at 0:13 history edited Shaun Han CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Nov 9, 2021 at 23:51 history edited Shaun Han CC BY-SA 4.0
added 113 characters in body
Nov 9, 2021 at 23:27 history edited Shaun Han CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Nov 9, 2021 at 23:21 history edited Shaun Han CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Nov 9, 2021 at 23:18 comment added user7868 I think you're looking for optimal control theory, the simplest form of which is Pontryagin's maximum principle.
Nov 9, 2021 at 23:04 history edited Shaun Han CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 19 characters in body
Nov 9, 2021 at 20:04 review Close votes
Nov 24, 2021 at 3:08
Nov 9, 2021 at 19:38 history asked Shaun Han CC BY-SA 4.0