Timeline for Equivariant phantom maps
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2021 at 10:44 | comment | added | N.B. | I mean if these equivariant phantom maps were extensively studied as well. "Even" referred to "studied" in the previous paragraph. A posteriori I added the sentence with the mention to Chirstensen and Strickland and I realize now that it makes the reference less clear. Anyway, my point is: this idea of defining and examining phantom maps in the equivariant setting cannot be a novelty, but I cannot find a paper or book discussing about it. | |
| Nov 9, 2021 at 16:34 | comment | added | Maxime Ramzi | what do you mean "even" ? Take $G=e$, and you get your good-old phantom maps, or for any $G$, inducing up a phantom map gives you a phantom map as well. Generally you should expect the equivariant situation to be more complicated not less. | |
| Nov 9, 2021 at 14:01 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added tag, formatting
|
| Nov 9, 2021 at 13:59 | history | asked | N.B. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |