Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

Titles of references
Source Link
LSpice
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

I know that the limiting eigenvalue distribution satisfies a variational principle (see e.g. the joint work with A. Kuijlaars https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.6261.pdfLarge Deviations for a Non-Centered Wishart Matrix) from which you may derive a degree three algebraic equation for the Sieltjes transform, and eventually recover an analytic formula for the limiting density using the Cauchy-PlemeljCauchy–Plemelj inversion formula.

More generally, the limiting distribution can be expressed as the rectangular free convolution (introduced by Benaych-Georges in http://www.cmapx.polytechnique.fr/~benaych/Rect.version.PTRF2009.pdfRectangular random matrices, related convolution) of the Marchenko-PasturMarchenko–Pastur distribution and a Dirac mass; next you can recover this algebraic equation using the associate rectangular R-transform.

I hope this helps and that you can work out the details by yourself. Otherwise, I'd start from the original Marchenko-PasturMarchenko–Pastur proof and adapt it so as to compute the asymptotics of the Stieljes transform of your matrix model, eventually leading as well after tedious computations to the same degree three algebraic equation.

I know that the limiting eigenvalue distribution satisfies a variational principle (see e.g. the joint work with A. Kuijlaars https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.6261.pdf) from which you may derive a degree three algebraic equation for the Sieltjes transform, and eventually recover an analytic formula for the limiting density using the Cauchy-Plemelj inversion formula.

More generally, the limiting distribution can be expressed as the rectangular free convolution (introduced by Benaych-Georges in http://www.cmapx.polytechnique.fr/~benaych/Rect.version.PTRF2009.pdf) of the Marchenko-Pastur distribution and a Dirac mass; next you can recover this algebraic equation using the associate rectangular R-transform.

I hope this helps and that you can work out the details by yourself. Otherwise, I'd start from the original Marchenko-Pastur proof and adapt it so as to compute the asymptotics of the Stieljes transform of your matrix model, eventually leading as well after tedious computations to the same degree three algebraic equation.

I know that the limiting eigenvalue distribution satisfies a variational principle (see e.g. the joint work with A. Kuijlaars Large Deviations for a Non-Centered Wishart Matrix) from which you may derive a degree three algebraic equation for the Sieltjes transform, and eventually recover an analytic formula for the limiting density using the Cauchy–Plemelj inversion formula.

More generally, the limiting distribution can be expressed as the rectangular free convolution (introduced by Benaych-Georges in Rectangular random matrices, related convolution) of the Marchenko–Pastur distribution and a Dirac mass; next you can recover this algebraic equation using the associate rectangular R-transform.

I hope this helps and that you can work out the details by yourself. Otherwise, I'd start from the original Marchenko–Pastur proof and adapt it so as to compute the asymptotics of the Stieljes transform of your matrix model, eventually leading as well after tedious computations to the same degree three algebraic equation.

Source Link
Adrien Hardy
Adrien Hardy
  • 2.1k
  • 17
  • 21

I know that the limiting eigenvalue distribution satisfies a variational principle (see e.g. the joint work with A. Kuijlaars https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.6261.pdf) from which you may derive a degree three algebraic equation for the Sieltjes transform, and eventually recover an analytic formula for the limiting density using the Cauchy-Plemelj inversion formula.

More generally, the limiting distribution can be expressed as the rectangular free convolution (introduced by Benaych-Georges in http://www.cmapx.polytechnique.fr/~benaych/Rect.version.PTRF2009.pdf) of the Marchenko-Pastur distribution and a Dirac mass; next you can recover this algebraic equation using the associate rectangular R-transform.

I hope this helps and that you can work out the details by yourself. Otherwise, I'd start from the original Marchenko-Pastur proof and adapt it so as to compute the asymptotics of the Stieljes transform of your matrix model, eventually leading as well after tedious computations to the same degree three algebraic equation.