Timeline for What is known about the cohomology of the U-duality group?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2021 at 9:25 | comment | added | Mikhail Borovoi | I took the liberty to edit the tags in order to alert the relevant people to your question. | |
| Nov 1, 2021 at 9:21 | history | edited | Mikhail Borovoi |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| Oct 31, 2021 at 17:49 | comment | added | David Ben-Zvi | (you might want to add the tag arithmetic-groups to alert the relevant people to your question) | |
| Oct 31, 2021 at 16:31 | comment | added | David Ben-Zvi | As to your last paragraph, the Cohomology of Arithmetic Groups (such as yours) is a huge subject, with a very large intersection with the Langlands program, and certainly not a consequence of cohomology of their real forms. (see e.g. under that heading the textbook by Harder or Venkatesh's Takagi lectures). | |
| Oct 31, 2021 at 16:19 | history | asked | Arun Debray | CC BY-SA 4.0 |