Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 1, 2021 at 11:06 vote accept Student
Oct 28, 2021 at 16:54 answer added Willie Wong timeline score: 2
Oct 28, 2021 at 14:03 comment added Student @WillieWong thank you very much for your remarks. I apologize for the lack of clarity. Indeed my goal is to control the energy when $t=\epsilon.$
Oct 28, 2021 at 13:03 comment added Willie Wong In particular: if you are prescribing data at $t = \epsilon$ and solving FORWARD in time ($t$ increasing), then your equation is anti-damped and you cannot expect energy decay in any reasonable sense. Solving backwards in time your equation is damped and you may get some better control. You need to make your setup a lot clearer since the arrow of time matters in these situations.
Oct 28, 2021 at 13:01 comment added Willie Wong I am still not sure about what your question is aiming at. You prescribe data to be identically vanishing at $t = \epsilon$. Are you trying to bound the energy at $t = 1$? Because that's the opposite of what I asked about in my previous comment which you seem to agree with.
Oct 28, 2021 at 11:42 comment added Student @WillieWong not sure how you derived the lower bound. Could you please explain?
Oct 28, 2021 at 3:10 comment added Willie Wong What do you exactly hope to accomplish? If you use $H(t) = \int |u_t|^2 + |\nabla u|^2$ the standard energy, you get $$ \frac{d}{dt} H(t) \geq - \frac{t}{4} \|g\|_{L^2}^2 $$ or that $$ H(1) + \int_\epsilon^1 \frac{t}{4} \|g\|_{L^2}^2 ~dt \geq H(\epsilon) $$ This gives boundedness of the standard energy and as $\epsilon \searrow 0$, and hence your weighted energy will decay like $\epsilon^2$. Are you looking somehow for more decay?
Oct 28, 2021 at 2:38 comment added Willie Wong Then your energy inequality is going the wrong way. If you integrate from $t = \epsilon$ to $t = 1$, your inequality gives $E(1) \leq E(\epsilon) + \frac{6E}{t} + \ldots$ whereas a useful equality will allow you to bound $E(\epsilon)$ in terms of $E(1)$.
Oct 27, 2021 at 20:51 history edited Student CC BY-SA 4.0
added 5 characters in body
Oct 27, 2021 at 20:24 comment added Student Yeah, that's right!
Oct 27, 2021 at 19:12 comment added Willie Wong Hang on, are you trying to solve backwards in time (with data at $t = 1$ and trying to show decay as $t\to 0$)?
Oct 27, 2021 at 18:37 history asked Student CC BY-SA 4.0