Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

added doi link to the paper (the question has been bumped anyway; according to the journal's website this paper is "open archive" - so no paywall)
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 4
  • 35
  • 40

In a recent article of Teruyuki Yorioka it is stated that it is open whether Q implies $\text{MA}_{\aleph_1}$. The reference is [A non-implication between fragments of Martin’s Axiom related to a property which comes from Aronszajn trees[A non-implication between fragments of Martin’s Axiom related to a property which comes from Aronszajn trees, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 161(4), p. 469-487]. I don't think the other implications are known either.

In a recent article of Teruyuki Yorioka it is stated that it is open whether Q implies $\text{MA}_{\aleph_1}$. The reference is [A non-implication between fragments of Martin’s Axiom related to a property which comes from Aronszajn trees, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 161(4), p. 469-487]. I don't think the other implications are known either.

In a recent article of Teruyuki Yorioka it is stated that it is open whether Q implies $\text{MA}_{\aleph_1}$. The reference is [A non-implication between fragments of Martin’s Axiom related to a property which comes from Aronszajn trees, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 161(4), p. 469-487]. I don't think the other implications are known either.

deleted 8 characters in body
Source Link
Stefan Geschke
Stefan Geschke
  • 16.2k
  • 2
  • 54
  • 82

In a recent article of Teruyuki Yorioka it is stated that it is open whether Q implies $\text{MA}_{\aleph_1}$ is open. The reference is [A non-implication between fragments of Martin’s Axiom related to a property which comes from Aronszajn trees, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 161(4), p. 469-487]. I don't think the other implications are known either.

In a recent article of Teruyuki Yorioka it is stated that it is open whether Q implies $\text{MA}_{\aleph_1}$ is open. The reference is [A non-implication between fragments of Martin’s Axiom related to a property which comes from Aronszajn trees, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 161(4), p. 469-487]. I don't think the other implications are known either.

In a recent article of Teruyuki Yorioka it is stated that it is open whether Q implies $\text{MA}_{\aleph_1}$. The reference is [A non-implication between fragments of Martin’s Axiom related to a property which comes from Aronszajn trees, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 161(4), p. 469-487]. I don't think the other implications are known either.

Source Link
Stefan Geschke
Stefan Geschke
  • 16.2k
  • 2
  • 54
  • 82

In a recent article of Teruyuki Yorioka it is stated that it is open whether Q implies $\text{MA}_{\aleph_1}$ is open. The reference is [A non-implication between fragments of Martin’s Axiom related to a property which comes from Aronszajn trees, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 161(4), p. 469-487]. I don't think the other implications are known either.