Timeline for Reference request: Weyl group action on the power set of positive roots
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 23, 2021 at 8:39 | comment | added | Jianrong Li | @AndreiSmolensky, yes, you are right. I would like to define a map to send ${\bf p}_{\bf i, \bf j}$ to ${\bf p}_{w \cdot \bf i, \bf j}$ for every $w \in S_m$. Maybe this is not necessarily an action. I would like to have a similar result as the Lemma for other Weyl groups. | |
Oct 23, 2021 at 8:34 | comment | added | Andrei Smolensky | Yes, but $w$ comes from $S_m$, not from $S_{n+1}$. | |
Oct 23, 2021 at 8:32 | history | edited | Jianrong Li | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
Oct 23, 2021 at 8:31 | comment | added | Jianrong Li | @AndreiSmolensky, thank you very much. In Equation (1), ${\bf p}_{{\bf i}, {\bf j}}$ is identified with a set of positive roots, $(i,j)$ is identified with $\alpha_i+\cdots + \alpha_j$. The action is $(w, {\bf p}_{{\bf i}, {\bf j}}) \mapsto {\bf p}_{w \cdot {\bf i}, {\bf j}}$. | |
Oct 23, 2021 at 8:19 | comment | added | Andrei Smolensky | I do not follow, where is the action of the Weyl group here? $W(\mathsf{A}_n)\cong S_{n+1}$, and here the power-set is acted on by $S_{n(n+1)/2}$. | |
Oct 23, 2021 at 7:19 | history | asked | Jianrong Li | CC BY-SA 4.0 |