Let me describe a 6-point counterexample.
Let $K$It meant to be a 2-dimensional cone with total angle $\theta=2\cdot\pi+\varepsilon$, where $\varepsilon$ is small and positive (any $0<\varepsilon<\tfrac\pi2$ will do). Note that $K$ is CAT(0).
Consider the following 6 points in $K$: the tip $p$ + and an orbit $\{x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5\}$ of the rotation by angle $\tfrac\theta5$.
Suppose that these 6 points admit an embedding into a product of theesanswer to another question, say $L$. Let $q$ be the image of $p$; denote by $\Sigma_q$ its space of directions. Note that any closed geodesic in $\Sigma_q$ has length either $2{\cdot}\pi$ or at least $3{\cdot}\pi$. (The latter statement can be prove along the same lines as Gromov's flag condition.)
Denote by $y_i$ the image of $x_i$. For any $i$ (mod 5) there is a flat geodesic quadrilateral $qy_{i-1}y_iy_{i+1}$ in $L$ thathttps://mathoverflow.net/a/406833/, but it is isometrican answer to the quadrilateral $px_{i-1}x_ix_{i+1}$. It follows that there is a closed geodesic in $\Sigma_q$ of length $\theta$ --- a contradictionthis question as well.
Comments:
For 5-point spaces this is true. With some extra work it can be extracted from charcterization of 5-point sets in CAT(0) space, see the paper of Tetsu Toyoda or our shorter proof.
Another related observation: it is not hard to see that octahedron comparison described at the end of our bipolar comparison holds for products of trees. It is unknow if it holds in general CAT(0) space.