Timeline for What is the limiting marginal distribution of a fixed number of coordinates of a random point drawn uniformly on large-dimensional sphere?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 26, 2021 at 16:52 | answer | added | jlewk | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 21, 2021 at 12:20 | answer | added | Iosif Pinelis | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 21, 2021 at 12:02 | comment | added | dohmatob | (continued) It would then follow from Scheffé's Lemma fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemme_de_Scheff%C3%A9 that the marginal distribution of $(X_1,\ldots,X_k)$ converges to $N(0,I_k)$ weakly. | |
Oct 21, 2021 at 11:38 | comment | added | dohmatob | Indeed, thanks. Reached same conclusion: $(X_1,\ldots,X_k)$ has density $$ p_k(x_1,\ldots,x_k) \propto \begin{cases}(1-\sum_{j=1}^k x_j^2/d)^{(d-k)/2},&\mbox{ if }\sum_{j=1}^k x_j^2 < d,\\ 0,&\mbox{ else.} \end{cases} $$ which converges to $\dfrac{e^{-\sum_{j=1}^k x_j^2/2}}{(2\pi)^{d/2}}$ for any $k=o_d(d)$, since $(1-t/d)^{d+o_d(d)} \to e^{-t}$. | |
Oct 21, 2021 at 11:33 | history | edited | dohmatob | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Oct 21, 2021 at 11:33 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | yes, it is true; the $x_j^2$'s are of order $1/d$, so $(1-\sum_{j=1}^k x_j^2)^{(d-k)/2}\rightarrow \exp\left(-(d/2)\sum_{j=1}^k x_j^2\right)$ for $d\rightarrow\infty$ at fixed $k$; the normalisation constraint $\sum_{j=1}^d x_j^2=1$ introduces correlations between the $x_j$'s that become ineffective if the fraction $k/d\rightarrow 0$. | |
Oct 21, 2021 at 11:27 | history | edited | dohmatob | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Oct 21, 2021 at 11:19 | history | edited | dohmatob | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Oct 21, 2021 at 11:12 | history | asked | dohmatob | CC BY-SA 4.0 |