Timeline for How to calculate Toeplitz-type determinant expansion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
27 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2021 at 22:32 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | Version 20 of this question. | |
| Nov 20, 2021 at 20:22 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 21:01 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 20:29 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 19:38 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 127 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 17:02 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 16:52 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 125 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 14:58 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 120 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 14:52 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 14:44 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 14:41 | comment | added | Sergii Voloshyn | @MaxAlekseyev ok. Now I reformulated the question. What would you say ? | |
| Oct 24, 2021 at 14:36 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 14:30 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 14:23 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body; edited title
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 12:31 | comment | added | Max Alekseyev | That's because the question was badly formulated - it was unclear where you started and what's the goal. It's getting better, but still not crystal clear. Also, I cannot parse your formulas w.r.t. $l_i$ - they are defined inside the parentheses, but then all of a sudden are used outside them. | |
| Oct 24, 2021 at 11:04 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 195 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 10:59 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 195 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 10:51 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 195 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 10:44 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 195 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2021 at 8:33 | comment | added | Sergii Voloshyn | @MaxAlekseyev How we use this formula, summation includes another $l_n$ in determinant. By the way, we start with $(1+h^2)^{N_f}$, why turn back ? | |
| Oct 22, 2021 at 15:20 | comment | added | Max Alekseyev | Please provide some background as well. Also, why don't you want just collapse the inner sum via binomial theorem: $$\sum_{l_n=0}^{N_f} \ h^{2 l_n} \ \binom{N_f}{l_n} = (1+h^2)^{N_f}$$ ? | |
| Oct 22, 2021 at 9:58 | comment | added | Sergii Voloshyn | $N_f, l_i$ is integer. $h$ is Real. | |
| Oct 22, 2021 at 1:46 | comment | added | Max Alekseyev | Please explain what are $N_f$, $h$, $l_i$ etc. | |
| Oct 22, 2021 at 1:23 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
You don't need \underset with \det; just use a subscript.
|
| Oct 21, 2021 at 16:04 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 25 characters in body
|
| Oct 21, 2021 at 15:52 | history | edited | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 44 characters in body; edited title
|
| Oct 21, 2021 at 10:39 | history | asked | Sergii Voloshyn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |