Skip to main content
Notice removed Improve details by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
deleted 12 characters in body
Source Link
Denis Serre
  • 52.3k
  • 10
  • 146
  • 300

Let $(S,g)$ be a Riemannian surface. Then the curvature function $\kappa: S\to \mathbb{R}$ can be counted as a random variable. So it produceproduces a probability density function $f_g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$. Similarly every Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ introduces a probability density function $f_g$ associated towith the scalar curvature $R:M\to \mathbb{R}$ as a random variable.

Question: Can one equipeequip a compact surface $S$ with a Riemannian metric $g$ such that the resulting probability distribution would be a uniform distribution, i.e the density function $f_g$ would bebe a constant function  ? What about the case of Riemannian manifolds, namely dimension greater than 2  ? If the answer is yes, can we choose an analytic Riemannian metric with the above mentioned property  ? (The distribution associated to the curvature function would be uniform.)

Let $(S,g)$ be a Riemannian surface. Then the curvature function $\kappa: S\to \mathbb{R}$ can be counted as a random variable. So it produce a probability density function $f_g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$. Similarly every Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ introduces a probability density function $f_g$ associated to the scalar curvature $R:M\to \mathbb{R}$ as a random variable.

Question: Can one equipe a compact surface $S$ with a Riemannian metric $g$ such that the resulting probability distribution would be a uniform distribution, i.e the density function $f_g$ would be a constant function? What about the case of Riemannian manifolds, namely dimension greater than 2? If the answer is yes can we choose an analytic Riemannian metric with the above mentioned property? (The distribution associated to the curvature function would be uniform.)

Let $(S,g)$ be a Riemannian surface. Then the curvature function $\kappa: S\to \mathbb{R}$ can be counted as a random variable. So it produces a probability density function $f_g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$. Similarly every Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ introduces a probability density function $f_g$ associated with the scalar curvature $R:M\to \mathbb{R}$ as a random variable.

Question: Can one equip a compact surface $S$ with a Riemannian metric $g$ such that the resulting probability distribution be a uniform distribution, i.e the density function $f_g$ be a constant function  ? What about the case of Riemannian manifolds, namely dimension greater than 2  ? If the answer is yes, can we choose an analytic Riemannian metric with the above mentioned property  ? (The distribution associated to the curvature function be uniform.)

Notice added Improve details by Ali Taghavi
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Ali Taghavi
formatting
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Curvature function as a Randomrandom variable with uniform distribution

Let $(S,g)$ be a Riemannian surface. Then the curvature function $\kappa: S\to \mathbb{R}$ can be counted as a random variable. So it produce a probability density function $f_g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$. Similarly every Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ introduces a probability density function $f_g$ associated to the scalar curvature $R:M\to \mathbb{R}$ as a random variable.

Question: Can one equipe a compact surface $S$ with a Riemannian metric $g$ such that the resulting probability distribution would be a uniform distribution, i.e the density function $f_g$ would be a constant function? What about the case of Riemannian manifolds, namely dimension greater than 2? If the answer is yes can we choose an analytic Riemannian metric with the above mentioned property?  (theThe distribution associated to the curvature function would be uniform.)

Curvature function as a Random variable with uniform distribution

Let $(S,g)$ be a Riemannian surface. Then the curvature function $\kappa: S\to \mathbb{R}$ can be counted as a random variable. So it produce a probability density function $f_g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$. Similarly every Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ introduces a probability density function $f_g$ associated to the scalar curvature $R:M\to \mathbb{R}$ as a random variable.

Question: Can one equipe a compact surface $S$ with a Riemannian metric $g$ such that the resulting probability distribution would be a uniform distribution, i.e the density function $f_g$ would be a constant function? What about the case of Riemannian manifolds, namely dimension greater than 2? If the answer is yes can we choose an analytic Riemannian metric with the above mentioned property?(the distribution associated to the curvature function would be uniform)

Curvature function as a random variable with uniform distribution

Let $(S,g)$ be a Riemannian surface. Then the curvature function $\kappa: S\to \mathbb{R}$ can be counted as a random variable. So it produce a probability density function $f_g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$. Similarly every Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ introduces a probability density function $f_g$ associated to the scalar curvature $R:M\to \mathbb{R}$ as a random variable.

Question: Can one equipe a compact surface $S$ with a Riemannian metric $g$ such that the resulting probability distribution would be a uniform distribution, i.e the density function $f_g$ would be a constant function? What about the case of Riemannian manifolds, namely dimension greater than 2? If the answer is yes can we choose an analytic Riemannian metric with the above mentioned property?  (The distribution associated to the curvature function would be uniform.)

added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

Let $(S,g)$ be a Riemannian surface. Then the curvature function $\kappa: S\to \mathbb{R}$ can be counted as a random variable. So it produce a probability density function $f_g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$. Similarly every Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ introduces a probability density function $f_g$ associated to the random variable $R:M\to \mathbb{R}$ as the scalar curvature $R:M\to \mathbb{R}$ as a random variable.

Question: Can one equipe a compact surface $S$ with a Riemannian metric $g$ such that the resulting probability distribution would be a uniform distribution, i.e the density function $f_g$ would be a constant function? What about the case of Riemannian manifolds, namely dimension greater than 2? If the answer is yes can we choose an analytic Riemannian metric with the above mentioned property?(the distribution associated to the curvature function would be uniform)

Let $(S,g)$ be a Riemannian surface. Then the curvature function $\kappa: S\to \mathbb{R}$ can be counted as a random variable. So it produce a probability density function $f_g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$. Similarly every Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ introduces a probability density function $f_g$ associated to the random variable $R:M\to \mathbb{R}$ as scalar curvature.

Question: Can one equipe a compact surface $S$ with a Riemannian metric $g$ such that the resulting probability distribution would be a uniform distribution, i.e the density function $f_g$ would be a constant function? What about the case of Riemannian manifolds, namely dimension greater than 2? If the answer is yes can we choose an analytic Riemannian metric with the above mentioned property?(the distribution associated to the curvature function would be uniform)

Let $(S,g)$ be a Riemannian surface. Then the curvature function $\kappa: S\to \mathbb{R}$ can be counted as a random variable. So it produce a probability density function $f_g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$. Similarly every Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ introduces a probability density function $f_g$ associated to the scalar curvature $R:M\to \mathbb{R}$ as a random variable.

Question: Can one equipe a compact surface $S$ with a Riemannian metric $g$ such that the resulting probability distribution would be a uniform distribution, i.e the density function $f_g$ would be a constant function? What about the case of Riemannian manifolds, namely dimension greater than 2? If the answer is yes can we choose an analytic Riemannian metric with the above mentioned property?(the distribution associated to the curvature function would be uniform)

deleted 20 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading