Skip to main content
replaced broken image math with latex
Source Link
Anton Geraschenko
  • 24k
  • 17
  • 127
  • 180

Let G$G$ and H$H$ be affine algebraic groups over a scheme S$S$ of characteristic 0 and let \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29$\textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H)$ be the functor T \mapsto \text{Hom}_{T,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?T%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Ctext%7BHom%7D%5F%7BT%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29$T \mapsto \text{Hom}\_{T,gp}(G,H)$

Theorem (SGA 3, expose XXIV, 7.3.1(a)): Suppose G is reductive. Then \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29$\textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H)$ is representable by a scheme.

Can this fail if G$G$ is not reductive? I worked out a few example with G = \mathbb{G}_a http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathbb%7BG%7D%5Fa$G = \mathbb{G}_a$, but they were representable.

Let G and H be affine algebraic groups over a scheme S of characteristic 0 and let \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 be the functor T \mapsto \text{Hom}_{T,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?T%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Ctext%7BHom%7D%5F%7BT%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29

Theorem (SGA 3, expose XXIV, 7.3.1(a)): Suppose G is reductive. Then \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 is representable by a scheme.

Can this fail if G is not reductive? I worked out a few example with G = \mathbb{G}_a http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathbb%7BG%7D%5Fa, but they were representable.

Let $G$ and $H$ be affine algebraic groups over a scheme $S$ of characteristic 0 and let $\textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H)$ be the functor $T \mapsto \text{Hom}\_{T,gp}(G,H)$

Theorem (SGA 3, expose XXIV, 7.3.1(a)): Suppose G is reductive. Then $\textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H)$ is representable by a scheme.

Can this fail if $G$ is not reductive? I worked out a few example with $G = \mathbb{G}_a$, but they were representable.

deleted 5 characters in body; added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Anton Geraschenko
  • 24k
  • 17
  • 127
  • 180

Let G and H be affine algebraic groups over a scheme S of characteristic 0 and let \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 be the functor

   T \mapsto \text{Hom}_{T,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?T%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Ctext%7BHom%7D%5F%7BT%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29

Theorem (SGA 3, expose XXIV, 7.3.1(a)): Suppose G is reductive. Then \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 is representable by a scheme.

Can this fail if G is not reductive? I worked out a few example with G = \mathbb{G}_a http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathbb%7BG%7D%5Fa, but they were representable.

Let G and H be affine algebraic groups over a scheme S of characteristic 0 and let \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 be the functor

 T \mapsto \text{Hom}_{T,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?T%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Ctext%7BHom%7D%5F%7BT%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29

Theorem (SGA 3, expose XXIV, 7.3.1(a)): Suppose G is reductive. Then \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 is representable by a scheme.

Can this fail if G is not reductive? I worked out a few example with G = \mathbb{G}_a http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathbb%7BG%7D%5Fa, but they were representable.

Let G and H be affine algebraic groups over a scheme S of characteristic 0 and let \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 be the functor  T \mapsto \text{Hom}_{T,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?T%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Ctext%7BHom%7D%5F%7BT%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29

Theorem (SGA 3, expose XXIV, 7.3.1(a)): Suppose G is reductive. Then \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 is representable by a scheme.

Can this fail if G is not reductive? I worked out a few example with G = \mathbb{G}_a http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathbb%7BG%7D%5Fa, but they were representable.

Rollback to Revision 1
Source Link
Anton Geraschenko
  • 24k
  • 17
  • 127
  • 180

Let G and H be affine algebraic groups over a scheme S of characteristic 0 and let \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 be the functor   

T \mapsto \text{Hom}_{T,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?T%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Ctext%7BHom%7D%5F%7BT%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29

Theorem (SGA 3, expose XXIV, 7.3.1(a)): Suppose G is reductive. Then \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 is representable by a scheme.

Can this fail if G is not reductive? I worked out a few example with G = \mathbb{G}_a http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathbb%7BG%7D%5Fa, but they were representable.

Let G and H be affine algebraic groups over a scheme S of characteristic 0 and let \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 be the functor  T \mapsto \text{Hom}_{T,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?T%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Ctext%7BHom%7D%5F%7BT%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29

Theorem (SGA 3, expose XXIV, 7.3.1(a)): Suppose G is reductive. Then \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 is representable by a scheme.

Can this fail if G is not reductive? I worked out a few example with G = \mathbb{G}_a http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathbb%7BG%7D%5Fa, but they were representable.

Let G and H be affine algebraic groups over a scheme S of characteristic 0 and let \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 be the functor 

T \mapsto \text{Hom}_{T,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?T%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Ctext%7BHom%7D%5F%7BT%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29

Theorem (SGA 3, expose XXIV, 7.3.1(a)): Suppose G is reductive. Then \textbf{Hom}_{S,gp}(G,H) http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Ctextbf%7BHom%7D%5F%7BS%2Cgp%7D%28G%2CH%29 is representable by a scheme.

Can this fail if G is not reductive? I worked out a few example with G = \mathbb{G}_a http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%5Cmathbb%7BG%7D%5Fa, but they were representable.

deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link
Anton Geraschenko
  • 24k
  • 17
  • 127
  • 180
Loading
Source Link
David Zureick-Brown
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 39
  • 96
Loading