Timeline for A question about the range of a positive measure
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2021 at 16:49 | vote | accept | jacaboul | ||
| Oct 10, 2021 at 9:40 | comment | added | juan | @jacobul I have ready a modification of my answer to make it more explicit when I see your suggestions. Now I am retired but I used this construction for years in my course of measure theory, suggested by other professor of my University. | |
| S Oct 10, 2021 at 9:37 | history | edited | juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I have added a more complete construction of the measurable set.
|
| S Oct 10, 2021 at 9:37 | history | suggested | jacaboul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
small edit in point (3)
|
| Oct 10, 2021 at 7:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 10, 2021 at 9:37 | |||||
| Oct 10, 2021 at 7:45 | comment | added | jacaboul | Thank you Juan, this what I was looking for. That $X$ must be a denumerable union of sets of measure $\le \epsilon$ was the point I was missing. | |
| Oct 9, 2021 at 6:56 | history | edited | juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 76 characters in body
|
| Oct 8, 2021 at 21:48 | history | answered | juan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |