Skip to main content
2 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 29, 2021 at 20:17 comment added Peter Humphries You misread Corollary 2.5: they first multiply the Eisenstein series by $\zeta(2s + 1)$ to get a "completed" Eisenstein series $E^{\ast}$, then conclude that $E^{\ast}$ (not $E$!) is holomorphic except possibly at $s = 1/2$. The key point is that the completed zeta function $\pi^{-s/2} \Gamma(s/2) \zeta(s)$ has poles only at $s = 0$ and $s = 1$, and otherwise is holomorphic; in particular, every term in the Fourier-Whittaker expansion in Theorem 2.4 is holomorphic.
Sep 29, 2021 at 17:40 history asked Aersk CC BY-SA 4.0