Timeline for Reference where the Siegel-Walfisz theorem for the Möbius function is proved
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2022 at 14:26 | answer | added | user859588 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 16:37 | comment | added | GH from MO | You can cite the exercises in your thesis or in your papers. That was my point. It is a standard result even if the proof is not spelled out in full anywhere. | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 15:13 | answer | added | kodlu | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 13:45 | history | edited | user147650 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| Sep 28, 2021 at 13:44 | comment | added | user147650 | @GHfromMO, Sorry I wasn't sure about the etiquette here (about naming your user handle outright). I was hoping that if the proof is there in literature, I could save time (I am about to hand in my thesis and under severe time constraints) and just cite it, instead of trying to prove it. But thanks for your comment! | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 13:38 | comment | added | GH from MO | The "someone" was me, see mathoverflow.net/questions/390774/… I think it is appropriate to quote Exercise 13 in Section 11.3 of Montgomery-Vaughan: Multiplicative number theory I., because it is broken down into 6 parts, and Exercises 6-12 prepare the scene for this exercise. That is, Montgomery-Vaughan gave a rather detailed sketch how to prove this result, and connecting the dots is really just an exercise. | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 13:35 | history | edited | user147650 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 28, 2021 at 12:31 | history | asked | user147650 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |