Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Oct 11, 2021 at 15:06 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Oct 11, 2021 at 15:06 history notice removed CommunityBot
S Oct 3, 2021 at 13:18 history bounty started Dick Johnson
S Oct 3, 2021 at 13:18 history notice added Dick Johnson Draw attention
Sep 28, 2021 at 16:00 history edited Tim Montegue CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Sep 28, 2021 at 15:19 comment added Jeremy Rickard @Wojowu Of course, you might argue that if one can’t even be bothered to be a domain, then one doesn’t deserve to have any torsion free modules.
Sep 28, 2021 at 15:10 comment added Jeremy Rickard @Wojowu For rings that are not domains, I think that “torsion free” usually means that no nonzero element is annihilated by a non zero divisor. Otherwise no nonzero module for a ring that is not a domain would be torsion free. Appeal to authority: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion-free_module
Sep 28, 2021 at 15:02 comment added Wojowu @JeremyRickard I don't think your example is torsion-free: the element $(1,0)\in R$ annihilates the element $(0,1)\in \{0\}\times\mathbb Z$.
Sep 28, 2021 at 13:43 comment added Tim Montegue @Fernando: Thank you for the information, I have removed the redundent assumption.
Sep 28, 2021 at 13:42 history edited Tim Montegue CC BY-SA 4.0
Edit: Removed the assumption of torsion-freeness since it was redundent.
Sep 28, 2021 at 13:14 comment added Fernando Muro If you ring is a domain, protective implies torsion free. Also, it's kind of unfair to change your questions after getting correct answers.
Sep 28, 2021 at 12:03 comment added Tim Montegue So I guess I was also assuming that $R$ has no zero-divisors. This rules out the counter example $R = S \times \mathbb{Z}$. Perhaps there are still trivial examples?
Sep 28, 2021 at 12:01 history edited Tim Montegue CC BY-SA 4.0
added 30 characters in body
Sep 28, 2021 at 12:01 history undeleted Tim Montegue
Sep 28, 2021 at 11:01 history deleted Tim Montegue via Vote
Sep 28, 2021 at 10:57 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 4.0
added missing dash
Sep 28, 2021 at 10:56 comment added Jeremy Rickard There are still trivial counterexamples. For example, if $R=S\times\mathbb{Z}$ then $0\times\mathbb{Z}$ is projective and torsion-free, but not faithfully flat.
Sep 28, 2021 at 10:51 comment added Tim Montegue @Jeremy: I had assumed that $\mathcal{N}$ is non-zero without writing it. I have now edited to make this clear.
Sep 28, 2021 at 10:50 history edited Tim Montegue CC BY-SA 4.0
added 22 characters in body
Sep 28, 2021 at 10:47 comment added Jeremy Rickard Is that really what you meant to ask? The zero module is projective and torsionfree, but not faithfully flat.
Sep 28, 2021 at 10:40 history asked Tim Montegue CC BY-SA 4.0