Timeline for Bernoulli distributions and $p$-adic measure on $K$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2021 at 13:26 | comment | added | MAS | @LSpice, alright. I can not edit the comment now. Do you want to delete it ? | |
| Oct 9, 2021 at 13:20 | history | edited | MAS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 444 characters in body; edited title
|
| Sep 28, 2021 at 18:21 | history | edited | MAS |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 28, 2021 at 18:19 | comment | added | MAS | @YCor, I think instead I can use the tag $\text{p-adic distribution}$ or $\text{p-adic interpolation}$ | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 18:18 | comment | added | YCor | Bernoulli distribution widely refers to a $(p,1-p)$ distribution. For this reason creating the tag bernoulli-distribution is likely to attract stuff that is quite irrelevant to this post. If you need a specific tag, you should make it more specific. | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 18:14 | vote | accept | MAS | ||
| Sep 28, 2021 at 18:14 | history | edited | YCor |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 28, 2021 at 17:30 | history | edited | MAS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 38 characters in body
|
| Sep 28, 2021 at 16:40 | comment | added | David Loeffler | The reason why the (regularized) Bernoulli measure is interesting is because it packages together the values of the Riemann zeta function into some $p$-adic object. If you view it this way, then the "correct" generalisations are other kinds of p-adic measures interpolating values of L-functions (e.g. the p-adic zeta functions for totally-real number fields constructed by Deligne and Ribet). | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 11:51 | history | edited | MAS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 287 characters in body
|
| Sep 28, 2021 at 11:36 | comment | added | MAS | @ChrisWuthrich, it is alright. I appreciate | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 10:16 | comment | added | Chris Wuthrich | Sorry for my now-deleted comment, I wasn't precise. I am still not precise in my answer, but I hope that it may be helpful. | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 10:15 | answer | added | Chris Wuthrich | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 28, 2021 at 3:19 | comment | added | LSpice |
The typesetting of text-in-math-in-text ($\text{like this}$) is very strange, so I restored it to just ordinary text (like this). If you'd like emphasis, you can italicise like this *like this* (or, as you observed, bold like this **like this**).
|
|
| Sep 28, 2021 at 3:18 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
$\text{}$ -> plain text
|
| Sep 28, 2021 at 2:55 | history | edited | MAS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 27, 2021 at 17:24 | history | asked | MAS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |