Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Powerspawn
  • 263
  • 1
  • 6

In the dynamic mode decomposition, we consider a sequence of data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ where $z_k \in \mathbb{R}^n$ for all $n$. We assume that the data satisfies the linear relationship $z_{k+1} =Az_k$ for some matrix $A$. We define the $n \times m$ matrices $X = [z_0 \: \cdots \: z_{m-1}]$ and $Y = [z_1 \: \cdots \: z_m]$, which satisfies $Y = AX$, so we let $A = YX^+$.

We use the SVD to compute a rank $r$ approximation $X_r = U_r \Sigma_r V_r^*$, and we define the matrices $$A_r = YX_r^+ = YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}U_r^*$$ $$\tilde{A}_r = U_r^*A_rU_r = U_r^*YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}$$

then $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ have the same non-zero eigenvalues, and we assume that $A_r$ will be a reasonable substitute for $A$.

This is nice and all, but I haven't found much information on what assumptions we need about ourthe data for $A_r$ to be a reasonable substitute for $A$. In fact, $\|X^+-X_r^+\| = \frac{1}{\sigma_s}$ in the spectral norm, where $\sigma_s$ is the smallest nonzero singular value of $X$. Moreover, we could define $X_r = LR^*$ for any full rank $n \times r$ and $m \times r$ matrices $L$ and $R$ as our "low rank approximation" of $X$. Then we may define $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ analogously, and they will also have the same nonzero eigenvalues. However, in this case $A_r$ is clearly not a suitable substitute for $A$ for arbitrary $L$ and $R$.

So what are the important properties that our data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ should have so that $A_r$ would be a reasonable substitute for $A$ in the dynamic mode decomposition? Similarly, what are the properties that our low rank approximation should have?

In the dynamic mode decomposition, we consider a sequence of data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ where $z_k \in \mathbb{R}^n$ for all $n$. We assume that the data satisfies the linear relationship $z_{k+1} =Az_k$ for some matrix $A$. We define the $n \times m$ matrices $X = [z_0 \: \cdots \: z_{m-1}]$ and $Y = [z_1 \: \cdots \: z_m]$, which satisfies $Y = AX$, so we let $A = YX^+$.

We use the SVD to compute a rank $r$ approximation $X_r = U_r \Sigma_r V_r^*$, and we define the matrices $$A_r = YX_r^+ = YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}U_r^*$$ $$\tilde{A}_r = U_r^*A_rU_r = U_r^*YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}$$

then $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ have the same non-zero eigenvalues, and we assume that $A_r$ will be a reasonable substitute for $A$.

This is nice and all, but I haven't found much information on what assumptions we need about our data for $A_r$ to be a reasonable substitute for $A$. In fact, $\|X^+-X_r^+\| = \frac{1}{\sigma_s}$ in the spectral norm, where $\sigma_s$ is the smallest nonzero singular value of $X$. Moreover, we could define $X_r = LR^*$ for any full rank $n \times r$ and $m \times r$ matrices $L$ and $R$ as our "low rank approximation" of $X$. Then we may define $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ analogously, and they will also have the same nonzero eigenvalues. However, in this case $A_r$ is clearly not a suitable substitute for $A$ for arbitrary $L$ and $R$.

So what are the important properties that our data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ should have so that $A_r$ would be a reasonable substitute for $A$ in the dynamic mode decomposition? Similarly, what are the properties that our low rank approximation should have?

In the dynamic mode decomposition, we consider a sequence of data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ where $z_k \in \mathbb{R}^n$ for all $n$. We assume that the data satisfies the linear relationship $z_{k+1} =Az_k$ for some matrix $A$. We define the $n \times m$ matrices $X = [z_0 \: \cdots \: z_{m-1}]$ and $Y = [z_1 \: \cdots \: z_m]$, which satisfies $Y = AX$, so we let $A = YX^+$.

We use the SVD to compute a rank $r$ approximation $X_r = U_r \Sigma_r V_r^*$, and we define the matrices $$A_r = YX_r^+ = YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}U_r^*$$ $$\tilde{A}_r = U_r^*A_rU_r = U_r^*YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}$$

then $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ have the same non-zero eigenvalues, and we assume that $A_r$ will be a reasonable substitute for $A$.

This is nice and all, but I haven't found much information on what assumptions we need about the data for $A_r$ to be a reasonable substitute for $A$. In fact, $\|X^+-X_r^+\| = \frac{1}{\sigma_s}$ in the spectral norm, where $\sigma_s$ is the smallest nonzero singular value of $X$. Moreover, we could define $X_r = LR^*$ for any full rank $n \times r$ and $m \times r$ matrices $L$ and $R$ as our "low rank approximation" of $X$. Then we may define $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ analogously, and they will also have the same nonzero eigenvalues. However, in this case $A_r$ is clearly not a suitable substitute for $A$ for arbitrary $L$ and $R$.

So what are the important properties that our data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ should have so that $A_r$ would be a reasonable substitute for $A$ in the dynamic mode decomposition? Similarly, what are the properties that our low rank approximation should have?

added 26 characters in body
Source Link
Powerspawn
  • 263
  • 1
  • 6

In the dynamic mode decomposition, we consider a sequence of data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ where $z_k \in \mathbb{R}^n$ for all $n$. We assume that the data satisfies the linear relationship $z_{k+1} =Az_k$ for some matrix $A$. We define the $n \times m$ matrices $X = [z_0 \: \cdots \: z_{m-1}]$ and $Y = [z_1 \: \cdots \: z_m]$, which satisfies $Y = AX$, so we let $A = YX^+$.

We use the SVD to compute a rank $r$ approximation $X_r = U_r \Sigma_r V_r^*$, and we define the matrices $$A_r = YX_r^+ = YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}U_r^*$$ $$\tilde{A}_r = U_r^*A_rU_r = U_r^*YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}$$

then $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ have the same non-zero eigenvalues, and we assume that $A_r$ will be a reasonable substitute for $A$.

This is nice and all, but I haven't found much information on what assumptions we need about our data for $A_r$ to be a reasonable substitute for $A$. In fact, $\|X^+-X_r^+\| = \frac{1}{\sigma_s}$ in the spectral norm, where $\sigma_s$ is the smallest nonzero singular value of $X$. Moreover, we could define $X_r = LR^*$ for any full rank $n \times r$ and $m \times r$ matrices $L$ and $R$ as our "low rank approximation" of $X$. Then we may define $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ analogously, and they will also have the same nonzero eigenvalues. However, in this case $A_r$ is clearly not a suitable substitute for $A$ for arbitrary $L$ and $R$.

So what are the important properties that our data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ should have so that $A_r$ would be a reasonable substitute for $A$ in the dynamic mode decomposition? Similarly, what are the properties that our low rank approximation should have?

In the dynamic mode decomposition, we consider a sequence of data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ where $z_k \in \mathbb{R}^n$ for all $n$. We assume that the data satisfies the linear relationship $z_{k+1} =Az_k$ for some matrix $A$. We define the $n \times m$ matrices $X = [z_0 \: \cdots \: z_{m-1}]$ and $Y = [z_1 \: \cdots \: z_m]$, which satisfies $Y = AX$, so we let $A = YX^+$.

We use the SVD to compute a rank $r$ approximation $X_r = U_r \Sigma_r V_r^*$, and we define the matrices $$A_r = YX_r^+ = YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}U_r^*$$ $$\tilde{A}_r = U_r^*A_rU_r = U_r^*YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}$$

then $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ have the same non-zero eigenvalues, and we assume that $A_r$ will be a reasonable substitute for $A$.

This is nice and all, but I haven't found much information on what assumptions we need about our data for $A_r$ to be a reasonable substitute for $A$. In fact, $\|X^+-X_r^+\| = \frac{1}{\sigma_s}$ in the spectral norm, where $\sigma_s$ is the smallest nonzero singular value of $X$. Moreover, we could define $X_r = LR^*$ for any full rank $n \times r$ and $m \times r$ matrices $L$ and $R$ as our "low rank approximation" of $X$. Then we may define $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ analogously, and they will also have the same nonzero eigenvalues. However, in this case $A_r$ is clearly not a suitable substitute for $A$.

So what are the important properties that our data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ should have so that $A_r$ would be a reasonable substitute for $A$ in the dynamic mode decomposition? Similarly, what are the properties that our low rank approximation should have?

In the dynamic mode decomposition, we consider a sequence of data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ where $z_k \in \mathbb{R}^n$ for all $n$. We assume that the data satisfies the linear relationship $z_{k+1} =Az_k$ for some matrix $A$. We define the $n \times m$ matrices $X = [z_0 \: \cdots \: z_{m-1}]$ and $Y = [z_1 \: \cdots \: z_m]$, which satisfies $Y = AX$, so we let $A = YX^+$.

We use the SVD to compute a rank $r$ approximation $X_r = U_r \Sigma_r V_r^*$, and we define the matrices $$A_r = YX_r^+ = YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}U_r^*$$ $$\tilde{A}_r = U_r^*A_rU_r = U_r^*YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}$$

then $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ have the same non-zero eigenvalues, and we assume that $A_r$ will be a reasonable substitute for $A$.

This is nice and all, but I haven't found much information on what assumptions we need about our data for $A_r$ to be a reasonable substitute for $A$. In fact, $\|X^+-X_r^+\| = \frac{1}{\sigma_s}$ in the spectral norm, where $\sigma_s$ is the smallest nonzero singular value of $X$. Moreover, we could define $X_r = LR^*$ for any full rank $n \times r$ and $m \times r$ matrices $L$ and $R$ as our "low rank approximation" of $X$. Then we may define $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ analogously, and they will also have the same nonzero eigenvalues. However, in this case $A_r$ is clearly not a suitable substitute for $A$ for arbitrary $L$ and $R$.

So what are the important properties that our data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ should have so that $A_r$ would be a reasonable substitute for $A$ in the dynamic mode decomposition? Similarly, what are the properties that our low rank approximation should have?

added 90 characters in body
Source Link
Powerspawn
  • 263
  • 1
  • 6

What are desirable properties that our data should satisfy to reasonably use the dynamic mode decomposition?

In the dynamic mode decomposition, we consider a sequence of data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ where $z_k \in \mathbb{R}^n$ for all $n$. We assume that the data satisfies the linear relationship $z_{k+1} =Az_k$ for some matrix $A$. We define the $n \times m$ matrices $X = [z_0 \: \cdots \: z_{m-1}]$ and $Y = [z_1 \: \cdots \: z_m]$, which satisfies $Y = AX$, so we let $A = YX^+$.

We use the SVD to compute a rank $r$ approximation $X_r = U_r \Sigma_r V_r^*$, and we define the matrices $$A_r = YX_r^+ = YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}U_r^*$$ $$\tilde{A}_r = U_r^*A_rU_r = U_r^*YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}$$

then $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ have the same non-zero eigenvalues, and we assume that $A_r$ will be a reasonable substitute for $A$.

This is nice and all, but I haven't found much information on what assumptions we need about our data for $A_r$ to be a reasonable substitute for $A$. In fact, $\|X^+-X_r^+\| = \frac{1}{\sigma_s}$ in the spectral norm, where $\sigma_s$ is the smallest nonzero singular value of $X$. Moreover, we could define $X_r = LR^*$ for any full rank $n \times r$ and $m \times r$ matrices $L$ and $R$ as our "low rank approximation" of $X$. Then we may define $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ analogously, and they will also have the same nonzero eigenvalues. However, in this case $A_r$ is clearly not a suitable substitute for $A$.

So what are the important properties that our data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ should have so that $A_r$ would be a reasonable substitute for $A$ in the dynamic mode decomposition? Similarly, what are the properties that our low rank approximation should have?

What are desirable properties that our data should satisfy to reasonably use the dynamic mode decomposition?

In the dynamic mode decomposition, we consider a sequence of data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ where $z_k \in \mathbb{R}^n$ for all $n$. We assume that the data satisfies the linear relationship $z_{k+1} =Az_k$ for some matrix $A$. We define the $n \times m$ matrices $X = [z_0 \: \cdots \: z_{m-1}]$ and $Y = [z_1 \: \cdots \: z_m]$, which satisfies $Y = AX$, so we let $A = YX^+$.

We use the SVD to compute a rank $r$ approximation $X_r = U_r \Sigma_r V_r^*$, and we define the matrices $$A_r = YX_r^+ = YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}U_r^*$$ $$\tilde{A}_r = U_r^*A_rU_r = U_r^*YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}$$

then $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ have the same non-zero eigenvalues, and we assume that $A_r$ will be a reasonable substitute for $A$.

This is nice and all, but I haven't found much information on what assumptions we need about our data for $A_r$ to be a reasonable substitute for $A$. In fact, $\|X^+-X_r^+\| = \frac{1}{\sigma_s}$ in the spectral norm, where $\sigma_s$ is the smallest nonzero singular value of $X$. Moreover, we could define $X_r = LR^*$ for any $n \times r$ and $m \times r$ matrices $L$ and $R$ as our "low rank approximation" of $X$. Then we may define $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ analogously, and they will also have the same nonzero eigenvalues. However, in this case $A_r$ is clearly not a suitable substitute for $A$.

So what are the important properties that our data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ should have so that $A_r$ would be a reasonable substitute for $A$ in the dynamic mode decomposition?

What are desirable properties that data should satisfy to reasonably use the dynamic mode decomposition?

In the dynamic mode decomposition, we consider a sequence of data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ where $z_k \in \mathbb{R}^n$ for all $n$. We assume that the data satisfies the linear relationship $z_{k+1} =Az_k$ for some matrix $A$. We define the $n \times m$ matrices $X = [z_0 \: \cdots \: z_{m-1}]$ and $Y = [z_1 \: \cdots \: z_m]$, which satisfies $Y = AX$, so we let $A = YX^+$.

We use the SVD to compute a rank $r$ approximation $X_r = U_r \Sigma_r V_r^*$, and we define the matrices $$A_r = YX_r^+ = YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}U_r^*$$ $$\tilde{A}_r = U_r^*A_rU_r = U_r^*YV_r \Sigma_r^{-1}$$

then $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ have the same non-zero eigenvalues, and we assume that $A_r$ will be a reasonable substitute for $A$.

This is nice and all, but I haven't found much information on what assumptions we need about our data for $A_r$ to be a reasonable substitute for $A$. In fact, $\|X^+-X_r^+\| = \frac{1}{\sigma_s}$ in the spectral norm, where $\sigma_s$ is the smallest nonzero singular value of $X$. Moreover, we could define $X_r = LR^*$ for any full rank $n \times r$ and $m \times r$ matrices $L$ and $R$ as our "low rank approximation" of $X$. Then we may define $A_r$ and $\tilde A_r$ analogously, and they will also have the same nonzero eigenvalues. However, in this case $A_r$ is clearly not a suitable substitute for $A$.

So what are the important properties that our data vectors $\{z_0, \dots, z_m\}$ should have so that $A_r$ would be a reasonable substitute for $A$ in the dynamic mode decomposition? Similarly, what are the properties that our low rank approximation should have?

formatting, added tag
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
Loading
Source Link
Powerspawn
  • 263
  • 1
  • 6
Loading