Timeline for Relating sequence with or without replacement
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2021 at 11:42 | comment | added | user381021 | For stats.stackexchange -- this feels morel ike probability than stats to me, but I suppose I can try. Thanks for the suggestion! | |
| Sep 22, 2021 at 11:39 | comment | added | user381021 | Yes, this is clearly the same! This equivalence, even though trivial, underlies a proof I have written for something less trivial (the look-down model, projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-probability/volume-24/…), so I'm asking around to see if people have seen this used or named before. Maybe it's just too trivial. | |
| Sep 22, 2021 at 1:57 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | [ We then pick randomly from the "previously picked" pile with probability c(n)/52, and from the top of the original deck with probability 1-c(n)/52 ] - but this is clearly just the same as choosing a random card, right? At any rate, possibly your question would be better received at stats.stackexchange.com. | |
| S Sep 21, 2021 at 18:04 | review | First questions | |||
| Sep 21, 2021 at 19:18 | |||||
| S Sep 21, 2021 at 18:04 | history | asked | user381021 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |