Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

I don't know about the promise problem, but my educated hunch is that computing the sum of the prime factors should indeed be roughly as hard as factoring. Here's why: let $N$ be odd and squarefree. Then if we can compute $sopf(N)$, we'll know the parity of the number of prime factors of $N$, which I've gone on recordgone on record as believing to be hard. (And nobody's contradicted me, so far...)

Terry Tao's answer to that question, by the way, is incredibly useful in thinking about these types of problems. It also indicates that we can sometimes compute the parity even when we can't do anything else, though; I don't know if that applies to number-of-prime-factors. (I am decidedly not a number theorist...)

I don't know about the promise problem, but my educated hunch is that computing the sum of the prime factors should indeed be roughly as hard as factoring. Here's why: let $N$ be odd and squarefree. Then if we can compute $sopf(N)$, we'll know the parity of the number of prime factors of $N$, which I've gone on record as believing to be hard. (And nobody's contradicted me, so far...)

Terry Tao's answer to that question, by the way, is incredibly useful in thinking about these types of problems. It also indicates that we can sometimes compute the parity even when we can't do anything else, though; I don't know if that applies to number-of-prime-factors. (I am decidedly not a number theorist...)

I don't know about the promise problem, but my educated hunch is that computing the sum of the prime factors should indeed be roughly as hard as factoring. Here's why: let $N$ be odd and squarefree. Then if we can compute $sopf(N)$, we'll know the parity of the number of prime factors of $N$, which I've gone on record as believing to be hard. (And nobody's contradicted me, so far...)

Terry Tao's answer to that question, by the way, is incredibly useful in thinking about these types of problems. It also indicates that we can sometimes compute the parity even when we can't do anything else, though; I don't know if that applies to number-of-prime-factors. (I am decidedly not a number theorist...)

added 241 characters in body
Source Link
Harrison Brown
  • 12.6k
  • 14
  • 70
  • 105

LetI don't know about the promise problem, but my educated hunch is that computing the sum of the prime factors should indeed be roughly as hard as factoring. Here's why: let $N$ be odd and squarefree. Then if we can compute $sopf(n)$$sopf(N)$, we'll know the parity of the number of prime factors of $N$, which I've gone on record as believing to be hard. (And nobody's contradicted me, so far, although if anything's possible to extract, it's the parity bit.) So, yeah, computing sopf() should be hard..)

Terry Tao's answer to that question, by the way, is infinitely more informative and interesting than mine incredibly useful in thinking about these types of problems. It also indicates that we can sometimes compute the parity even when we can't do anything else, though; I don't know if that applies to number-of- mine's simply more relevantprime-factors. (I am decidedly not a number theorist...)

Let $N$ be odd and squarefree. Then if we can compute $sopf(n)$, we'll know the parity of the number of prime factors of $N$, which I've gone on record as believing to be hard. (And nobody's contradicted me so far, although if anything's possible to extract, it's the parity bit.) So, yeah, computing sopf() should be hard.

Terry Tao's answer to that question, by the way, is infinitely more informative and interesting than mine -- mine's simply more relevant.

I don't know about the promise problem, but my educated hunch is that computing the sum of the prime factors should indeed be roughly as hard as factoring. Here's why: let $N$ be odd and squarefree. Then if we can compute $sopf(N)$, we'll know the parity of the number of prime factors of $N$, which I've gone on record as believing to be hard. (And nobody's contradicted me, so far...)

Terry Tao's answer to that question, by the way, is incredibly useful in thinking about these types of problems. It also indicates that we can sometimes compute the parity even when we can't do anything else, though; I don't know if that applies to number-of-prime-factors. (I am decidedly not a number theorist...)

Source Link
Harrison Brown
  • 12.6k
  • 14
  • 70
  • 105

Let $N$ be odd and squarefree. Then if we can compute $sopf(n)$, we'll know the parity of the number of prime factors of $N$, which I've gone on record as believing to be hard. (And nobody's contradicted me so far, although if anything's possible to extract, it's the parity bit.) So, yeah, computing sopf() should be hard.

Terry Tao's answer to that question, by the way, is infinitely more informative and interesting than mine -- mine's simply more relevant.