Timeline for Does Borel fixed-point theorem hold for Deligne-Mumford stacks?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2021 at 8:14 | history | edited | Chi Hong Chow | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added a potentially useful fact
|
| Sep 18, 2021 at 8:32 | comment | added | Chi Hong Chow | @AriyanJavanpeykar Thanks! Edited based on your comments. Also clarified the assumption for the statement which had potential to cause confusion. | |
| Sep 18, 2021 at 8:28 | history | edited | Chi Hong Chow | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Deleted the redundant condition "finite type" and clarify the assumption for the statement. Others are given in EDIT 1&2.
|
| Sep 17, 2021 at 15:58 | comment | added | Ariyan Javanpeykar | Welcome Chi Hong Chow. Minor comment: "proper DM stack of finite type over $\mathbb{C}$" is a bit redundant. It suffices to say "proper DM stack over $\mathbb{C}$". Also, could you explain how the argument using Borel's fixed-point theorem goes for schemes? | |
| Sep 17, 2021 at 12:19 | history | edited | Chi Hong Chow |
the tag "reference-request" added
|
|
| S Sep 17, 2021 at 8:50 | review | First questions | |||
| Sep 17, 2021 at 8:58 | |||||
| S Sep 17, 2021 at 8:50 | history | asked | Chi Hong Chow | CC BY-SA 4.0 |