Timeline for Is it improper to define matrices as being $n \times m$ rather than $m \times n$? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2021 at 4:42 | history | closed |
abx Yemon Choi Benjamin Steinberg Alexey Ustinov GH from MO |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Sep 17, 2021 at 4:29 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Then I think that would be fine, although it might cause some readers a bit of confusion when they see an unexpected expression. | |
| Sep 16, 2021 at 21:00 | comment | added | Powerspawn | The convention I'm using is that $n \times m$ means $n$ rows and $m$ columns. | |
| Sep 16, 2021 at 20:29 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | The point is not whether one says "n by m" or "m by n" but whether the first number counts rows or counts columns | |
| Sep 16, 2021 at 19:52 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Stefan Kohl♦ | ||
| Sep 16, 2021 at 18:56 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 17, 2021 at 4:42 | |||||
| Sep 16, 2021 at 17:29 | vote | accept | Powerspawn | ||
| Sep 16, 2021 at 17:21 | history | edited | Powerspawn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 16, 2021 at 17:17 | answer | added | Firdous Ahmad Mala | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 16, 2021 at 17:16 | answer | added | Pace Nielsen | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 16, 2021 at 17:11 | history | asked | Powerspawn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |