Skip to main content
copied title to post
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Is there a more interesting name for this graph invariant: edges minus vertices? It seems to have been called 'complexity' in

  • Remco van der Hofstad, Joel Spencer, Counting Connected Graphs Asymptotically, European Journal of Combinatorics 27 Issue 8 (2006) 1294–1320, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2006.05.006, arXiv:math/0502579

and in

The motivation is that we want to talk about a quantity that is preserved under the graph transformation of collapsing two distinct vertices connected by an edge to a single vertex (thereby removing one edge and one vertex, preserving 'edges minus vertices'). So for example if the quantity 'edges minus vertices plus one' is more natural for some reason and has a name, then this would also be helpful. The concept should not be restricted to e.g. planar graphs.

Is there a more interesting name for this graph invariant? It seems to have been called 'complexity' in

  • Remco van der Hofstad, Joel Spencer, Counting Connected Graphs Asymptotically, European Journal of Combinatorics 27 Issue 8 (2006) 1294–1320, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2006.05.006, arXiv:math/0502579

and in

The motivation is that we want to talk about a quantity that is preserved under the graph transformation of collapsing two distinct vertices connected by an edge to a single vertex (thereby removing one edge and one vertex, preserving 'edges minus vertices'). So for example if the quantity 'edges minus vertices plus one' is more natural for some reason and has a name, then this would also be helpful. The concept should not be restricted to e.g. planar graphs.

Is there a more interesting name for this graph invariant: edges minus vertices? It seems to have been called 'complexity' in

  • Remco van der Hofstad, Joel Spencer, Counting Connected Graphs Asymptotically, European Journal of Combinatorics 27 Issue 8 (2006) 1294–1320, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2006.05.006, arXiv:math/0502579

and in

The motivation is that we want to talk about a quantity that is preserved under the graph transformation of collapsing two distinct vertices connected by an edge to a single vertex (thereby removing one edge and one vertex, preserving 'edges minus vertices'). So for example if the quantity 'edges minus vertices plus one' is more natural for some reason and has a name, then this would also be helpful. The concept should not be restricted to e.g. planar graphs.

Fixed links, added tag
Source Link
David Roberts
  • 35.4k
  • 11
  • 124
  • 349

Is there a more interesting name for this graph invariant? It seems to have been called 'complexity' here http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0502579in

  • Remco van der Hofstad, Joel Spencer, Counting Connected Graphs Asymptotically, European Journal of Combinatorics 27 Issue 8 (2006) 1294–1320, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2006.05.006, arXiv:math/0502579

and here http://www.mathunion.org/ICM/ICM1994.2/Main/icm1994.2.1375.1383.ocr.pdf .in

The motivation is that we want to talk about a quantity that is preserved under the graph transformation of collapsing two distinct vertices connected by an edge to a single vertex (thereby removing one edge and one vertex, preserving 'edges minus vertices'). So for example if the quantity 'edges minus vertices plus one' is more natural for some reason and has a name, then this would also be helpful. The concept should not be restricted to e.g. planar graphs.

Is there a more interesting name for this graph invariant? It seems to have been called 'complexity' here http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0502579 and here http://www.mathunion.org/ICM/ICM1994.2/Main/icm1994.2.1375.1383.ocr.pdf .

The motivation is that we want to talk about a quantity that is preserved under the graph transformation of collapsing two distinct vertices connected by an edge to a single vertex (thereby removing one edge and one vertex, preserving 'edges minus vertices'). So for example if the quantity 'edges minus vertices plus one' is more natural for some reason and has a name, then this would also be helpful. The concept should not be restricted to e.g. planar graphs.

Is there a more interesting name for this graph invariant? It seems to have been called 'complexity' in

  • Remco van der Hofstad, Joel Spencer, Counting Connected Graphs Asymptotically, European Journal of Combinatorics 27 Issue 8 (2006) 1294–1320, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2006.05.006, arXiv:math/0502579

and in

The motivation is that we want to talk about a quantity that is preserved under the graph transformation of collapsing two distinct vertices connected by an edge to a single vertex (thereby removing one edge and one vertex, preserving 'edges minus vertices'). So for example if the quantity 'edges minus vertices plus one' is more natural for some reason and has a name, then this would also be helpful. The concept should not be restricted to e.g. planar graphs.

added 9 characters in body; Post Made Community Wiki
Source Link
ohai
  • 173
  • 1
  • 5
  • 12

Is there a more interesting name for this graph invariant? It seems to have been called 'complexity' here http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0502579 and here http://www.mathunion.org/ICM/ICM1994.2/Main/icm1994.2.1375.1383.ocr.pdf .

The motivation is that we want to talk about a quantity that is preserved under the graph transformation of collapsing two distinct vertices connected by an edge to a single vertex (thereby removing one edge and one vertex, preserving 'edges minus vertices'). So for example if the quantity 'edges minus vertices plus one' is more natural for some reason and has a name, then this would also be helpful. The concept should not be restricted to e.g. planar graphs.

Is there a more interesting name for this graph invariant? It seems to have been called 'complexity' here http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0502579 and here http://www.mathunion.org/ICM/ICM1994.2/Main/icm1994.2.1375.1383.ocr.pdf .

The motivation is that we want to talk about a quantity that is preserved under the graph transformation of collapsing two vertices connected by an edge to a single vertex (thereby removing one edge and one vertex, preserving 'edges minus vertices'). So for example if the quantity 'edges minus vertices plus one' is more natural for some reason and has a name, then this would also be helpful. The concept should not be restricted to e.g. planar graphs.

Is there a more interesting name for this graph invariant? It seems to have been called 'complexity' here http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0502579 and here http://www.mathunion.org/ICM/ICM1994.2/Main/icm1994.2.1375.1383.ocr.pdf .

The motivation is that we want to talk about a quantity that is preserved under the graph transformation of collapsing two distinct vertices connected by an edge to a single vertex (thereby removing one edge and one vertex, preserving 'edges minus vertices'). So for example if the quantity 'edges minus vertices plus one' is more natural for some reason and has a name, then this would also be helpful. The concept should not be restricted to e.g. planar graphs.

Source Link
ohai
  • 173
  • 1
  • 5
  • 12
Loading