Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 22, 2021 at 15:29 comment added No One @MondaleJr. Oh I see, sorry! Now I am kind of confused about the last paragraph in arxiv.org/pdf/1709.04082.pdf#page=2#... which say "almost all"...
Nov 21, 2021 at 2:38 comment added Calamardo There is no union in the theorem (Theorem 1.1).
Nov 20, 2021 at 17:21 history edited No One CC BY-SA 4.0
added 93 characters in body
Nov 20, 2021 at 17:18 comment added No One @MondaleJr. No. The union in that theorem is from $0<c<1$ which exclude the case when $c=1$ (which is what I am asking)... There is a critical difference I believe, in view of Minkowski' convex body theorem
Nov 20, 2021 at 13:01 comment added Calamardo arxiv.org/abs/2111.07115 Theorem 1.1 clarifies why $D_{m,n}$ is all matrices.
Oct 14, 2021 at 15:08 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Sep 14, 2021 at 14:51 answer added Ronnie Pavlov timeline score: 1
Sep 13, 2021 at 18:33 comment added No One @RonniePavlov Sorry for my late reply. As I indicated in the first line of question $\|\|$ here denotes the maximum norm in ANY Euclidean space. And yes, the superscript indices $m,n$ mean the exponentials.
Sep 8, 2021 at 16:07 comment added Ronnie Pavlov What do your superscripts represent in $\|Aq - p\|^m$ and $\|q\|^n$? Are they exponents? If so, is the norm just understood to be distance in the proper Euclidean space(s) (i.e. $\mathbb{R}^m$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$ respectively?) Or was the superscript just meant to be a subscript denoting the proper Euclidean norm?
Sep 7, 2021 at 18:13 history asked No One CC BY-SA 4.0