Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 7, 2021 at 1:40 comment added Tim Campion Haha! I think you did encourage me to read those papers a few times, and I think I looked a little bit, but I didn't end up going through in detail.
Sep 7, 2021 at 0:35 comment added Chris Schommer-Pries @TimCampion Your advisor was clearly negligent. He should have had you read all of the Barwick-Kan papers. I think I might write him a pointed email instructing him to do better in the future ;) . (Regardless, I think you would enjoy these papers very much. Most of them are very short and to-the-point -- a rare quality in our field; Also Kan's literary style comes through strongly and is quite singular among math papers - I personally love it, though I know some hate it. Also the n-relative category model is wild! Worth knowing about!!).
Sep 4, 2021 at 22:35 vote accept Tim Campion
Sep 4, 2021 at 12:38 history edited Chris Schommer-Pries CC BY-SA 4.0
typo
Sep 4, 2021 at 12:30 history edited Chris Schommer-Pries CC BY-SA 4.0
Added explicit functor giving cofibrant replacement.
Sep 3, 2021 at 16:08 comment added Chris Schommer-Pries Yes, that is one way to get that. If you dive into the Barwick-Kan machinery a bit more you can also see that the $\infty$-categorical localization $P[W^{-1}]$ can be taken to mean the hammock localization, whose homotopy category is the usual 1-categorical localization.
Sep 3, 2021 at 16:03 comment added Tim Campion This is beautiful, thanks! In the last paragraph, I suppose you're using the following observation: if the $\infty$-categorical localization $P[W^{-1}]$ happens to be a 1-category, then it coincides with the 1-categorical localization (which unfortunately I also denoted $P[W^{-1}]$).
Sep 3, 2021 at 15:52 history answered Chris Schommer-Pries CC BY-SA 4.0