Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Sep 28, 2010 at 16:00 comment added BCnrd The tensoring method works over $\overline{\mathbf{F}}_p$ using maximal orders in the quaternion algebra (and invertible modules over such orders), and you then need an "integral" refinement of Skolem-Noether applied to the subfield $K$. The 2-to-1 will come from the fact that the CM-structure by $R$ amounts to extra data, namely a choice of isomorphism of $R$ with the endomorphism ring over %\mathbf{F}_p$, and these are two such choices.
Sep 28, 2010 at 13:48 comment added Tommaso Centeleghe BCnrd, thanks for your comment. Can we explain why the number of supersingular $j$-invariants lying in the prime field is actually half as much as the number of $F_p$-isom. classes of objects of S?
Sep 28, 2010 at 13:16 comment added BCnrd For #1, no natural base pt. Better formulation is not a bijection but rather a principal homogeneous space structure. For any invertible $R$-module $M$ and $E$ in $S$, the functor on $\mathbf{F}_p$-algebras defined by $A \rightsquigarrow M \otimes_R E(A)$ is represented by an elliptic curve denoted $M \otimes E$, and the natural map $M \otimes_E {\rm{Hom}}_R(E,E') \rightarrow {\rm{Hom}}_R(E,M \otimes E')$ between invertible $R$-modules is an isomorphism (pf: use Tate isogeny theorem at all primes). This shows that the tensoring operation makes $S$ a principal homogenous space for Pic($R$).
Sep 28, 2010 at 11:51 history edited Tommaso Centeleghe CC BY-SA 2.5
edited title
Sep 28, 2010 at 10:45 history asked Tommaso Centeleghe CC BY-SA 2.5